Soft Bond Potential for Stable Free Energy Calculations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Calculating free energy differences between thermodynamic states, particularly in cases involving bond breaking and formation in ring structures, is computationally inefficient and prone to numerical instability due to singularities in conventional methods.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a soft bond potential that modulates bonded stretch interactions with a coupling parameter, ensuring continuous and bounded energy functions for molecular simulations, allowing accurate free energy calculations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional methods (harmonic bond potential) are used to calculate free energy differences involving bond breaking and formation, then the calculation framework is simple, but numerical instability and singularities occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumerical stabilityVSAvoidpotential function complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameterization of the bond potential from a conventional harmonic form to a soft-core potential form with a coupling parameter λ. This parameter transformation eliminates the singularity that occurs at zero bond length while maintaining the ability to describe bond breaking and formation continuously throughout the transformation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a soft-core potential as an intermediary function that mediates between the bonded and unbonded states. This intermediate potential form avoids the direct singularity problem by providing a smooth transition path, allowing free energy calculations to proceed without numerical instability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If annihilation and growth of rings from scratch are performed, then complete structural transformation is achieved, but computational efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefree energy calculation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of completely annihilating and regenerating ring structures, the patent applies partial action by using alchemical transformations that gradually modify bond parameters. This approach maintains the structural framework while making incremental changes, significantly reducing computational cost while preserving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary setup by defining the alchemical transformation pathway and coupling parameter schedule before the actual free energy calculation. This preliminary configuration allows the simulation to follow a predetermined efficient path, avoiding the need for computationally expensive de novo structure generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If fused ring structures are transformed, then complex structural changes are achieved, but computational feasibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural transformation capabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex fused ring transformation into multiple independent alchemical steps, each involving simple bond breaking or formation events. By dividing the overall transformation into manageable segments with simple topology changes, the method makes complex structural transformations computationally feasible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic coupling parameters that evolve continuously during the simulation, allowing the system to adaptively transition between different structural states. This dynamic approach enables handling of complex structural changes by continuously adjusting the transformation progress rather than using fixed discrete steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260024625A1Methods and Systems For Calculating Free Energy Differences Using A Modified Bond Stretch Potential
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 SCHRODINGER INC
  • US20260024625A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024625A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024625A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for calculating the free energy difference between a target state and a reference state. The method includes determining one or more intermediate states using a coupling parameter, performing molecular simulations to obtain ensembles of micro-states for each of the system states, and calculating the free energy difference by an analysis of the ensembles of micro-states of the system states. The method can be particularly suited for calculating physical or non-physical transformation of molecular systems such as ring-opening, ring-closing, and other transformations involving bond breaking and/or formation. A soft bond potential dependent on a bond stretching component of the coupling parameter and different from the conventional harmonic potential is used in the molecular simulations of the system states for the bond being broken or formed during the transformation.