Soft Channel Reservation for Interference Management in Shared Spectrum

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face interference challenges in shared spectrum networks, leading to communication inefficiencies and increased latency due to the need for medium-sensing procedures among multiple network operating entities.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of soft channel reservation (SCR) techniques, which involve channel reservation signaling and interference assessment to dynamically adjust transmission based on channel condition information, allowing prioritized and opportunistic access to shared spectrum resources, thereby reducing link-to-link interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If medium-sensing procedures are implemented in shared spectrum networks, then interference between network operating entities is reduced, but communication latency increases and network efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference reductionVSAvoidcommunication latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary channel reservation signaling before actual data transmission. Network operating entities send reservation signals to indicate their intent to use the shared spectrum, allowing other entities to assess potential interference in advance and adjust their transmissions accordingly, eliminating the need for real-time medium-sensing procedures during data transmission

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes a feedback mechanism where network operating entities transmit channel condition information based on received reservation signals. This feedback loop enables dynamic adjustment of transmission parameters and facilitates coordinated resource allocation, reducing interference without requiring continuous medium sensing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If channel reservation signaling is implemented, then resource allocation efficiency is improved, but device complexity and signaling overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidsignaling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes changes in signal parameters (presence/absence of reservation signals, channel condition metrics) to convey resource allocation information. By encoding resource allocation intent in parameter variations rather than complex signaling protocols, the system achieves efficient resource management with minimal signaling overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables network operating entities to autonomously assess channel conditions and make transmission decisions based on received reservation signals. Each entity independently evaluates the channel state information and determines its own transmission strategy, reducing the need for centralized control and complex coordination signaling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3590299B1Soft channel reservation
Publication Date: 2021.05.05 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP3590299B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3590299B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3590299B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Soft channel reservation in shared spectrum networks is discussed. In network areas where multiple wireless nodes, whether from the same or different network operators, share spectrum using a channel reservation signaling form of contention resolution, an aggressor transmitter listens for a neighbor receiver's receiver channel reservation signal to the neighbor transmitter the neighbor receiver is in communication with. The receiver channel reservation signal includes channel condition information that the aggressor transmitter can use to estimate an interference impact at the neighbor receiver should the aggressor transmitter performs its transmissions to its own receivers. Based on whether this estimated interference impact exceeds or remains within a particular threshold, the aggressor transmitter may decide whether or not to back off of its transmissions until a later time.