Soft-Decision Random Linear Decoding for Wireless Error Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In general data communication, receivers face challenges with error detection and correction due to low signal quality, where demodulators mistakenly decode symbols and decoders struggle to identify erroneous bits, leading to increased communication overhead and error recovery needs.

Innovation Solution

A method using soft decision information and random linear coding in wireless access systems, where received code blocks are arranged by soft decision levels, and random linear decoding is performed, with error correction involving retransmission of blocks with low soft decision levels and replacement of erroneous blocks with higher-level ones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional demodulation and decoding is performed without soft decision information, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of data transmission deteriorates due to inability to accurately identify erroneous bits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing soft decision demodulation before decoding, where the demodulator outputs soft decision values (likelihood information) for each received bit. This preliminary soft information is then utilized by the decoder to improve error correction capability, thereby enhancing reliability without requiring complex post-decoding error detection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces soft decision values as an intermediary between demodulation and decoding. These soft values serve as a mediator that carries reliability information from the demodulator to the decoder, enabling the decoder to make more informed decisions about which bits are likely erroneous and require correction, thus improving reliability without directly increasing decoder complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If error recovery process is performed on all received packets, then the reliability is improved, but the loss of time increases due to retransmission overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror recovery capabilityVSAvoidretransmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary information for error recovery by using soft decision values to identify specifically which bits are erroneous. Instead of retransmitting entire packets or performing comprehensive error recovery on all received data, the system extracts and corrects only the problematic bits based on soft decision information, reducing retransmission overhead and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing error correction only on the specific bits identified as erroneous through soft decision analysis, rather than processing all bits in received packets. This selective approach reduces the amount of data requiring retransmission and minimizes time loss while maintaining reliability for the critical erroneous portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Device complexity

If hard decision decoding is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the loss of information occurs because the decoder cannot recognize which bits generated errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoder complexityVSAvoiderror location information
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using soft decision values to provide reliability information back to the decoding process. The soft values indicate the likelihood of each bit being correct or erroneous, creating a feedback mechanism that guides the decoder's error correction actions without requiring complex additional hardware, thus preserving error location information while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation from hard binary decisions (0 or 1) to soft decision values that convey reliability information. This parameter transformation allows the decoder to access error location information through the soft values' magnitude and sign, enabling informed error correction without significantly increasing decoder complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8711978B2Method and apparatus of communication using soft decision
Publication Date: 2014.04.29 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US8711978B2 patent drawing
  • US8711978B2 patent drawing
  • US8711978B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for performing a reliable communication using soft decision information and a random linear coding in the wireless access system is disclosed. The communication method includes arranging received random-linear-coded first code blocks in descending order of their soft decision levels, and performing a random linear decoding on a first code block set, wherein the first code block set is constructed of the first code blocks arranged in the descending order of their soft decision levels. If any error occurs in the random linear decoding step of the first code block set, the method further includes performing a random linear decoding on a second code block set, wherein the second code block set is constructed when a code block having the lowest soft decision level among code blocks contained in the first code block set is replaced with another first code block.