Soft Robotic Grippers With User-Assisted Control for Adaptive Picking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional robotic grippers are expensive, inflexible, and incapable of handling objects of varying weights, sizes, and shapes, making them unsuitable for environments with uncertainty and diversity in object characteristics.

Innovation Solution

The development of soft robotic actuators made from elastomeric materials, such as rubber or thin plastic, which are inflatable with fluids to change shape and conform to objects, allowing for adaptive grasping and motion capabilities, along with a user-assisted control system that includes modular grippers and advanced user interfaces for efficient robotic control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional robotic grippers are used, then structural strength and precision are improved, but adaptability and cost are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegripper structural strengthVSAvoidadaptability to varying objects
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs soft robotic actuators constructed from flexible elastomeric materials that can deform and conform to objects of varying shapes, sizes, and weights. These flexible shells replace rigid gripper structures, enabling adaptive grasping while maintaining sufficient structural integrity through material selection and actuator design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes pneumatic or hydraulic actuation to dynamically change the physical parameters of the soft actuators, including volume, pressure, and shape. By controlling fluid injection and extraction, the system can adapt the gripper's configuration in real-time to match different object characteristics, resolving the contradiction between structural rigidity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If soft robotic actuators are used, then adaptability and cost are improved, but manufacturing precision is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to varying objectsVSAvoidactuator shape control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates sensors and control systems that provide real-time feedback on actuator deformation and object contact forces. This feedback loop enables closed-loop control, compensating for the inherent flexibility of soft materials and achieving precise shape control and positioning despite the soft actuators' compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional rigid mechanical linkages and joints with pneumatic or hydraulic fluid systems to control actuator deformation. This substitution allows for smoother, more continuous shape control and reduces the need for precise mechanical tolerances, as fluid pressure can be controlled with high resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Extent of automation

If conventional robotic systems are used, then automation level is improved, but ease of operation is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobotic automation levelVSAvoidsystem configuration ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-configures the soft robotic actuators with embedded sensors, fluid channels, and control electronics during manufacturing. This preliminary integration of components simplifies system assembly and operation, as the actuators arrive as ready-to-deploy modules requiring minimal configuration or calibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs universal soft actuator modules that can perform multiple functions through software control and configuration. A single actuator type can be programmed to execute different grasping patterns, force profiles, and motion sequences, reducing the need for specialized hardware for each task and simplifying system operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Soft robotic actuators provide a cost-effective, adaptable, and safe solution for handling diverse objects without damage, while the user-assisted control system enhances the efficiency and flexibility of robotic operations in various applications, including warehouse management and recycling.

Implementation Method 1

soft robotic actuators made from elastomeric materials, such as rubber or thin plastic, which are inflatable with fluids to change shape and conform to objects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInflation: Pressurisation

Data Source

PatentUS11179856B2User-assisted robotic control systems
Publication Date: 2021.11.23 SOFT ROBOTICS INC
  • US11179856B2 patent drawing
  • US11179856B2 patent drawing
  • US11179856B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Exemplary embodiments relate to user-assisted robotic control systems, user interfaces for remote control of robotic systems, vision systems in robotic control systems, and modular grippers for use by robotic systems. Systems, methods, apparatuses and computer-readable media instructions are disclosed for interactions with and control of robotic systems, in particular, pick and place systems using soft robotic actuators to grasp, move and release target objects.