Soft-Kill Countermeasure System Using Tracking Radar

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current soft-kill countermeasures in electronic warfare lack effective threat confirmation and rapid response capabilities, especially against multiple simultaneous threats, due to reliance on optical sensors and delayed threat avoidance mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A soft-kill countermeasure system utilizing a tracking radar to detect, track, and divert incoming projectiles by generating a beam of electromagnetic energy, allowing for immediate threat defeat confirmation and rapid redirection to address additional threats.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If soft-kill countermeasures rely on optical sensors and delayed threat avoidance mechanisms, then the system structure is simpler, but the response time is delayed and threat confirmation is ineffective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines optical sensors, tracking radar, beam generators, and processors into an integrated soft-kill countermeasure system. The tracking radar and optical sensors work together to detect and track threats, while the processor coordinates their data to enable real-time response confirmation and rapid redirection to additional threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The tracking radar serves as an intermediary component that bridges the gap between simple optical detection and complex response systems. It provides intermediate tracking capability that enables real-time threat confirmation without requiring the full complexity of hard-kill countermeasure systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If soft-kill countermeasures use traditional optical sensors only, then the device complexity is lower, but the ability to counter multiple simultaneous threats is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to counter multiple threatsVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated system performs multiple functions: optical sensors detect threat launches, tracking radar locates and tracks projectiles, processors analyze data to confirm threat defeat, and beam generators divert additional threats. This multi-functional architecture enables the system to handle multiple simultaneous threats effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the tracking radar continuously monitors threat trajectories and the processor evaluates whether threats have been successfully diverted. This feedback enables real-time confirmation of threat defeat and allows the system to rapidly redirect beam generators to address additional threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If soft-kill countermeasures lack tracking radar integration, then the system is simpler to operate, but threat defeat confirmation is delayed until after impact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat defeat confirmationVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The tracking radar provides continuous feedback on threat location and trajectory. The processor uses this feedback to determine whether a threat has been successfully diverted by comparing pre-divert and post-divert trajectory data, enabling real-time confirmation of threat defeat without waiting for impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the traditional mechanical/waiting approach to threat confirmation with an electronic/radar-based detection and analysis system. Instead of waiting for physical impact to confirm threat defeat, the radar and processor electronically detect and analyze trajectory changes to provide immediate confirmation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables immediate confirmation of threat defeat and rapid adaptation to counter multiple simultaneous threats, enhancing the effectiveness of soft-kill countermeasures by integrating tracking radar technology for precise threat identification and countermeasure deployment.

Implementation Method 1

a tracking radar having one or more antenna elements operable to locate and track the projectile

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

a beam generator operable to generate a beam of electromagnetic energy configured to counter the threat posed by the projectile

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation:

Data Source

PatentUS11181346B1Methods for enhanced soft-kill countermeasure using a tracking radar
Publication Date: 2021.11.23 BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION ANDELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC
  • US11181346B1 patent drawing
  • US11181346B1 patent drawing
  • US11181346B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A soft-kill countermeasure system utilizing a tracking radar to enhance existing countermeasures and enable new countermeasures to be utilized to combat the ever evolving and increasing sophistication of threats. The use of the tracking radar may further allow for immediate threat defeat confirmation which may allow for rapid or immediate redirection of the countermeasure system to address additional simultaneous threats.