Soft Magnetic Alloy Powder Composition for Low Coercivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing soft magnetic alloy powders do not adequately address the need for improved sphericity and reduced coercivity in compositions different from those disclosed in Patent Document 1, limiting their effectiveness in reducing energy loss and improving power supply efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A soft magnetic alloy powder with a composition of (Fe(1−(α+β))X1αX2β)(1−(a+b+c+d+e+f))MaBbPcSidCeSf, where X1 and X2 are specific elements, and M is a group of metals, is formulated to achieve low coercivity and high sphericity, with controlled contents of B, S, and other elements to prevent crystal growth and enhance amorphousness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional soft magnetic alloy compositions are used, then manufacturing is simpler, but sphericity and coercivity performance are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesphericityVSAvoidcomposition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the composition ratios of multiple elements (Fe, Co, Ni, Al, Mn, Ag, Zn, Sn, As, Sb, Cu, Cr, Bi, N, O, rare earth elements, Nb, Hf, Zr, Ta, Mo, W, Ti, V, B, P, Si, C, S) within specific ranges. This compositional parameter optimization achieves high sphericity (0.90 or more) and low coercivity (3.0 Oe or less) while maintaining manufacturability through defined composition boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining multiple metallic elements in a specific alloy formulation. The soft magnetic alloy powder integrates Fe-based matrix with controlled additions of Co, Ni, Al, Mn, and other elements, creating a composite structure that simultaneously improves sphericity, reduces coercivity, and enables nanocrystal formation for enhanced magnetic properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If element contents are increased to improve magnetic characteristics, then coercivity decreases, but crystal growth occurs reducing amorphousness

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecoercivityVSAvoidamorphousness
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the composition ratios of multiple elements (Fe, Co, Ni, Al, Mn, Ag, Zn, Sn, As, Sb, Cu, Cr, Bi, N, O, rare earth elements, Nb, Hf, Zr, Ta, Mo, W, Ti, V, B, P, Si, C, S) within specific ranges. This compositional parameter optimization achieves high sphericity (0.90 or more) and low coercivity (3.0 Oe or less) while maintaining manufacturability through defined composition boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating a dual-phase structure with amorphous matrix regions and controlled nanocrystal regions. The composition is designed so that B, P, Si, C, and S elements locally suppress crystal growth in the matrix while allowing controlled nanocrystal formation, achieving low coercivity through this heterogeneous local structure rather than uniform composition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If sphericity is improved by composition optimization, then filling rate increases, but coercivity reduction is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling rateVSAvoidcoercivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the composition ratios of multiple elements (Fe, Co, Ni, Al, Mn, Ag, Zn, Sn, As, Sb, Cu, Cr, Bi, N, O, rare earth elements, Nb, Hf, Zr, Ta, Mo, W, Ti, V, B, P, Si, C, S) within specific ranges. This compositional parameter optimization achieves high sphericity (0.90 or more) and low coercivity (3.0 Oe or less) while maintaining manufacturability through defined composition boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining multiple metallic elements in a specific alloy formulation. The soft magnetic alloy powder integrates Fe-based matrix with controlled additions of Co, Ni, Al, Mn, and other elements, creating a composite structure that simultaneously improves sphericity, reduces coercivity, and enables nanocrystal formation for enhanced magnetic properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS12406787B2Soft magnetic alloy powder, dust core, magnetic component, and electronic device
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 TDK CORP
  • US12406787B2 patent drawing
  • US12406787B2 patent drawing
  • US12406787B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A soft magnetic alloy powder includes a main component of (Fe(1−(α+β))X1αX2β)(1−(a+b+c+d+e+f))MaBbPcSidCeSf, in which X1 is one or more of Co and Ni, X2 is one or more of Al, Mn, Ag, Zn, Sn, As, Sb, Cu, Cr, Bi, N, O, and rare earth elements, and M is one or more of Nb, Hf, Zr, Ta, Mo, W, Ti, and V. 0≤a≤0.160, 0.020≤b≤0.200, 0≤c≤0.150, 0≤d≤0.060, 0≤e≤0.030, 0.0010≤f≤0.030, 0.005≤f/b≤1.50, α≥0, β≥0, and 0≥α+β≥0.50 are satisfied.