Soft Starter Firing Control Using Rotor Flux for Three-Phase Motors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling three-phase motors, such as model-predictive control, require high computing power, leading to significant costs and complexity, especially when considering real-time motor behavior prediction.

Innovation Solution

A method that operates a three-phase motor using a soft starter, where decisions to ignite thyristors are based on both network-related and rotor flux-related criteria, reducing the need for detailed motor parameters and predictions, and requiring only a few angular operations and comparisons, thus significantly reducing computing power requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If model-predictive control method is used to predict motor behavior in real time, then operating behavior is improved, but computing power requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating behaviorVSAvoidcomputing power
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential elements needed for control decision-making (voltage vector position and rotor flux vector position) from the complex model-predictive control approach. By taking out only the critical angular position information and ignoring detailed motor parameter predictions, the system achieves similar operating behavior with dramatically reduced computing power requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using complex motor models to predict behavior and then deciding on firing actions, the patent inverts the approach by directly comparing angular positions of voltage and rotor flux vectors to determine optimal firing timing. This inversion simplifies the control logic from prediction-based to geometry-based decision making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Measurement precision

If detailed motor parameters and predictions are used for firing decisions, then control precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the angular position information of the rotor flux vector and voltage vector, discarding the need for detailed motor parameters such as resistance, inductance, and inertia. This extraction maintains control precision by focusing on the critical geometric relationship between vectors while eliminating complex parameter dependencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameters from detailed motor parameters (resistance, inductance, inertia) to simplified angular position parameters (voltage vector angle and rotor flux vector angle). This parameter transformation reduces device complexity while preserving essential control functionality through geometric relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If model-predictive control is implemented, then operating behavior is improved, but implementation difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating behaviorVSAvoidimplementation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the complex model-predictive control approach into a simple geometric comparison method. Instead of implementing sophisticated prediction algorithms, the system simply compares the angular positions of two vectors and fires thyristors when the voltage vector leads the rotor flux vector by a specific angle range, making implementation straightforward and industrially viable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified copy of the model-predictive control functionality by using basic vector angle comparisons rather than full motor modeling. This copied approach replicates the essential control behavior (reducing motor and thyristor losses) without requiring the computational infrastructure of the original complex method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentEP4002676B1Method for operating a three-phase motor
Publication Date: 2024.02.21 SIEMENS AG
  • EP4002676B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4002676B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4002676B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating a three-phase motor (4) on a multi-phase electrical network (5) by means of a soft starter (1) with which one or more network phases (a, b, c) of the network (5) can be switched by triggering thyristors (2). In addition to a network-related triggering criterion, a rotor flux-related triggering criterion is taken into account.