Software Behavior Detection via Clustering and Function Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enterprise software systems exhibit complex operational behaviors that are difficult to characterize and model effectively, leading to challenges in understanding and optimizing their performance.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for automatically detecting and characterizing software system behaviors by incrementally summarizing data using various functions, determining the optimal number of behaviors, and ranking aspects that separate these behaviors, utilizing techniques like k-means clustering and data partitioning to identify and rank operational characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional performance monitoring approaches are used to track software system metrics, then data collection is straightforward, but the complexity of characterizing and modeling multiple operational behaviors increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collectionVSAvoidbehavior characterization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the continuous operational data into distinct behavioral modes using clustering algorithms. Each mode represents a specific operational characteristic (e.g., different response time patterns under varying workload conditions). This segmentation transforms the complex continuous data into discrete, manageable behavior categories that are easier to characterize and model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer that automatically detects and characterizes behavioral modes between raw data collection and performance analysis. This intermediary layer uses unsupervised learning algorithms to identify patterns and create behavioral summaries, acting as a mediator that simplifies the complexity of direct behavior characterization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple functions are used to summarize behavioral data, then characterization accuracy improves, but the computational complexity and time required for analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebehavior characterization accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using a limited set of representative functions (e.g., linear, quadratic, exponential) to summarize behavioral data within each detected mode. Instead of attempting to model all possible behaviors with complex functions, the system selectively applies appropriate simple functions to capture the essential characteristics of each behavioral mode, achieving sufficient accuracy with reduced computational effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-service through automatic function selection and parameter optimization. The algorithm automatically determines which function type best fits each behavioral mode and adjusts parameters without requiring manual intervention or extensive computational searching, thereby reducing analysis time while maintaining characterization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of information

If comprehensive behavioral analysis is performed to identify all operational characteristics, then system understanding improves, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring behaviors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem behavior understandingVSAvoidbehavior detection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the detected behavioral modes inform subsequent data collection and analysis. The system continuously monitors operational data, detects behavioral changes, and adjusts its analysis focus based on identified patterns. This feedback loop improves system understanding over time while reducing the difficulty of detection by concentrating resources on relevant behavioral aspects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-defining a set of potential behavioral modes and characteristics to look for in the data. Rather than attempting to detect all possible behaviors simultaneously, the system prepares targeted detection strategies for known operational patterns, making the detection and measurement process more manageable while still achieving comprehensive system understanding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11048612B2Automatic behavior detection and characterization in software systems
Publication Date: 2021.06.29 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US11048612B2 patent drawing
  • US11048612B2 patent drawing
  • US11048612B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for efficiently detecting an optimal number of behaviors to model software system performance data and the aspects of the software systems that best separate the behaviors. The behaviors may be ranked according to how well fitting functions partition the performance data.