Software Dependency Analysis for Essentiality Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Software applications face issues due to unmanaged dependencies, where deletion, corruption, or incompatible updates of dependencies can cause the software to break, and developers struggle with identifying essential, expiring, or nonessential dependencies, leading to potential errors or inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for analyzing software dependencies, determining their attributes (essential, expiring, nonessential), and prioritizing them, which includes recursively identifying sub-dependencies, providing notifications, and flagging critical dependencies, allowing developers to take corrective or preemptive actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If developers use dependencies to implement features across multiple software applications, then updating features becomes faster and easier, but the risk of software breaking increases when dependencies are deleted, corrupted, or updated incompatibly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature update speedVSAvoidsoftware stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of dependencies before updates or deletions occur. It proactively identifies essential dependencies and potential compatibility issues, allowing developers to take preventive actions before software breaks, thus maintaining both productivity and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors dependency status and provides feedback to developers about which dependencies are essential, expiring, or nonessential. This feedback loop enables informed decision-making when managing dependencies, reducing the risk of unintentional software breakdowns while maintaining efficient update processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Quantity of substance

If developers manually manage dependencies without automated analysis, then software can run with fewer resources, but developers struggle to identify essential versus nonessential dependencies leading to errors and inefficiencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource consumptionVSAvoiddependency management difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated dependency analysis and classification without requiring extensive manual intervention. The tool independently identifies essential, expiring, and nonessential dependencies, reducing the operational burden on developers while maintaining low resource consumption through efficient analysis algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the state of dependency information from unclassified to classified by analyzing various parameters of dependencies. It transforms raw dependency data into actionable insights by determining essentiality, expiration status, and priority levels, making dependency management easier without significant resource overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If developers update dependencies to newer versions, then software features can be enhanced, but incompatible updates can cause the software to break

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware feature enhancementVSAvoidsoftware compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Before applying dependency updates, the system performs preliminary compatibility analysis to identify potential issues. It checks whether newer versions of dependencies are compatible with the existing software codebase, allowing developers to enhance features safely while preventing compatibility-breaking updates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback about dependency update compatibility, informing developers which updates are safe to apply and which may cause software breakdowns. This enables informed decision-making when enhancing software features through dependency updates while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9760349B1Managing different software dependencies associated with source code
Publication Date: 2017.09.12 RED HAT INC
  • US9760349B1 patent drawing
  • US9760349B1 patent drawing
  • US9760349B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Software dependencies can be managed by a system. For example, the system can determine multiple dependencies associated with source code for software. A dependency can be a segment of program code that is separate from the source code and to be incorporated into the source code. The system can determine multiple attributes associated with the multiple dependencies. Each attribute can be associated with a respective dependency and indicate if the respective dependency is at least one of (i) an essential dependency that is necessary to create executable code from the source code, (ii) a nonessential dependency that is unnecessary to create the executable code from the source code, or (iii) an expiring dependency for which there is a newer version of the dependency available that is incompatible with the source code. The system can sort the multiple dependencies based on the multiple attributes.