Software Distribution via Component Differentiation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems and methods fail to reliably update software across different deployment environments, often resulting in corrupted or incomplete updates due to environmental factors such as disconnected networks, leading to inefficiencies and user frustration.

Innovation Solution

The method involves recursively disassembling software deployment packages into components, generating component differentiations between versions, and creating a distribution package based on these differentiations and the package structure, allowing for accurate and efficient deployment of updates across various environments, even in disconnected settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complete software deployment packages are distributed to all deployment environments, then software updates can be deployed, but network bandwidth is consumed and transmission time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware update deployment reliabilityVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The software deployment package is segmented into individual components, and only the specific components that differ between versions are identified and distributed. This allows partial updates rather than complete package redistribution, reducing network bandwidth consumption while maintaining deployment reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and identifies only the specific components that need to be updated by comparing the current version with the previous version. By taking out only the necessary differential components rather than distributing the entire package, network bandwidth is conserved while ensuring reliable updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If complete software deployment packages are distributed, then updates can be deployed, but transmission time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware update deployment reliabilityVSAvoidtransmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The deployment package is divided into discrete components, enabling the system to transmit only the specific components that require updates. This segmentation reduces the total data volume that needs transmission, thereby decreasing transmission time while maintaining complete and reliable update deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial action by transmitting only the necessary differential components rather than the complete package. This partial transmission approach reduces transmission time significantly while still achieving the complete update deployment goal through component-level precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If software is distributed without component-level analysis, then distribution is simpler, but missing or corrupted components cannot be identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware distribution simplicityVSAvoidcomponent completeness and integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by comparing the current deployment package components with the previous version components. This comparison process provides feedback information about which components are missing or corrupted, enabling the system to identify and address issues while maintaining operational simplicity through automated analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The manual or simple distribution approach is replaced with an automated component-level analysis system. This substitution introduces intelligent comparison and identification capabilities that detect missing or corrupted components, enhancing reliability while the automated nature maintains ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If large software packages are transmitted, then complete updates are provided, but network usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate completenessVSAvoidnetwork usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and transmits only the specific components that differ between software versions by comparing the current package with the previous version. This extraction of differential components ensures complete updates are provided while minimizing network usage by excluding redundant identical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system identifies and discards components that remain unchanged between versions, recovering network bandwidth by not transmitting these redundant elements. Only the necessary differential components are transmitted, maintaining update completeness while reducing overall network usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS20230359452A1Systems and methods for software distribution
Publication Date: 2023.11.09 PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20230359452A1 patent drawing
  • US20230359452A1 patent drawing
  • US20230359452A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for software distribution are disclosed. For example, the method includes: receiving a first deployment package for a first version of software; recursively disassembling the first deployment package into a plurality of components; accessing a set of second components of a second deployment package for a second version of the software; generating one or more component differentiations based at least in part upon the plurality of components associated with the first deployment package and the set of second components of the second deployment package, a first component differentiation of the one or more component differentiations being a difference between a first component associated with the first deployment package and a second component in the disassembled components of the second deployment package; and generating a distribution package based on the one or more component differentiations and a package structure associated with a component structure of the first deployment package.