Automatic Software Component Integration Testing via Script Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for automatic testing of software applications struggle with integrating and testing subsets of software components in running applications, especially when each application has a unique interface and data structure, making it impractical to perform the same integration tests across different applications.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that automatically test the integration of a subset of software components in a running software application by obtaining a test script specification, determining if further components implement process definitions, creating a new test script, and simulating user input to control the application, all without manually created integration tests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual integration tests are created for each different software application, then testing coverage can be achieved, but the work effort increases significantly and error risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting coverageVSAvoidwork effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates test scripts by copying and adapting a master test script template. Instead of manually creating unique tests for each application, the system generates test scripts by replacing placeholders with application-specific information, dramatically reducing manual effort while maintaining comprehensive testing coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service testing by automatically generating test scripts without requiring manual intervention. The test script generation process is automated through systematic replacement of placeholders with application-specific data, allowing the system to serve its own testing needs without external manual effort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Stability of the object's composition

If the same integration test is performed on different software applications, then testing consistency can be maintained, but the unique interface and data structure of each application make this approach inapplicable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting consistencyVSAvoidapplication-specific customization
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The test script template contains localized placeholders that are replaced with application-specific information. This allows the overall test structure to remain consistent while adapting specific parts (interface names, data structures, component references) to match each application's unique characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters within the test script by systematically replacing placeholders with application-specific values. This maintains the structural consistency of the test while adapting the content to reflect each application's unique interface and data structure through parameter substitution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If a software application is built from an application-specific subset of components, then flexibility in application composition is achieved, but the interface and data structure become different for each application

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication composition flexibilityVSAvoidinterface and data structure variability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The master test script template serves as a universal framework that can be applied to any software application regardless of its specific component subset. The template's placeholders allow it to adapt to different interfaces and data structures, making it multi-functional across diverse application compositions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4315070B1Automatic testing of interrelated components of a software application
Publication Date: 2025.05.07 NOVULO R&D BV
  • EP4315070B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4315070B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4315070B1 patent drawingFigure 4~9

AI summary

A system (1) for automatic testing of a software application while the software application (93) is running, e.g. on another system (13), is configured to obtain a test script specification associated with a software component of the software application. A test step comprised in the test script specification comprises a reference to a process definition stored in a catalog but not implemented by the software component. The system is further configured to determine whether a further software component of the software application implements the process definition, create a new version of the test script specification in which the reference to the process definition has been replaced with a reference to an implementation of the process definition in the further software component in dependence thereon, create a test script (151) based on the new version, and control the software application by simulating user input according to the test script.