Software Load Balancing for Multiplane Network Traffic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multiplane networks face challenges in load balancing, leading to increased flow completion times, queuing latency, and packet reordering due to loading imbalances, which existing technologies fail to address effectively.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a software-based load balancing system that formats data flows and selects planes based on load statuses, combined with hardware-based load balancing for non-fixed data flows, to dynamically manage traffic and reduce congestion across multiple planes in a multiplane network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If software-based load balancing is applied to fixed data flows, then network performance is improved and queuing latency is reduced, but device complexity increases due to the need for software-hardware coordination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork performanceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments data flows into two categories: fixed data flows (requiring order preservation) and non-fixed data flows (allowing flexible routing). This segmentation allows different load balancing strategies to be applied to each type, improving overall network performance while managing complexity through targeted rather than universal software intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary component that coordinates between software load balancing decisions and hardware routing mechanisms. This intermediary manages the complexity by abstracting the coordination layer, allowing software-based load balancing for fixed flows while maintaining hardware efficiency for non-fixed flows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If load balancing is implemented across multiple planes, then traffic distribution is improved and head-of-line blocking is reduced, but flow completion time may increase due to migration overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic distributionVSAvoidflow completion time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic load balancing that adapts to real-time network conditions. For fixed data flows, planes are selected and maintained dynamically based on load status to reduce head-of-line blocking. For non-fixed flows, dynamic plane switching is enabled without ordering constraints. This dynamic approach optimizes traffic distribution while managing completion time through condition-based decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of plane selection based on flow type and network conditions. Fixed data flows use parameters that prioritize order preservation and load balancing, while non-fixed flows use parameters that prioritize speed and flexibility. This parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction by optimizing for different objectives in different scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If software-based load balancing is used for fixed data flows, then packet reordering is minimized, but queuing latency increases due to software processing overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacket orderingVSAvoidqueuing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments processing paths based on flow type. Fixed data flows undergo software-based load balancing to ensure proper ordering and reduce reordering. Non-fixed flows bypass software processing and use hardware-based routing for faster transmission. This segmentation reduces overall queuing latency by applying software processing only where necessary for reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates separate processing paths or copies for different flow types. Fixed flows are copied to software processing queues that guarantee ordering, while non-fixed flows use hardware acceleration paths that prioritize speed. This copying approach allows parallel processing with optimized characteristics for each flow type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20240340242A1Systems, methods, and devices for load balancing in multiplane networks
Publication Date: 2024.10.10 MELLANOX TECHNOLOGIES LTD(IL)
  • US20240340242A1 patent drawing
  • US20240340242A1 patent drawing
  • US20240340242A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A network device for load balancing in a multiplane network comprises a software stack that formats a data flow for transmission, and one or more circuits that identify the formatted data flow as a fixed data flow, and apply software-based load balancing to select a first plane, from among a plurality of planes of the multiplane network, for transmitting one or more data packets of the fixed data flow.