Software Interface Maturity-Based Feature Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enterprise software systems often present a challenge as they are complex and heterogeneous, making it difficult to tailor functionality to the varying needs and abilities of diverse user populations within an organization, leading to inadequate adoption and utilization.

Innovation Solution

The system classifies users based on maturity levels and uses feature rules to customize the software application interfaces, allowing for tailored presentation of features according to user maturity, enabling fine-grained adaptation to user groups with minimal administrative effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If enterprise software systems present comprehensive functionality to all users, then the software provides complete feature coverage, but users with lower maturity levels find the interface daunting and confusing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware functionality coverageVSAvoiduser interface usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The software interface is segmented into multiple maturity levels (Level 1, Level 2, Level 3) with distinct feature sets. Each level presents only the functionality appropriate for users at that maturity stage, dividing the comprehensive feature set into manageable portions that progressively unlock as users advance through training and adoption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interface dynamically adapts its complexity based on user maturity level. The system automatically adjusts which features are visible and accessible according to the user's classified maturity level, transforming the static interface into a dynamic one that responds to user capabilities in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the software interface presents all features to users, then complete functionality is available, but the complexity increases for users and administrators

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature completenessVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complete feature set is segmented across multiple maturity levels, with each level containing a specific subset of features. This segmentation reduces the visible complexity at any given time while maintaining feature completeness across all levels, allowing administrators to manage the system without overwhelming users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The maturity level classification system acts as an intermediary between the comprehensive feature set and the user interface. This intermediary layer automatically filters and selects appropriate features based on user maturity, shielding users from unnecessary complexity while preserving access to advanced features when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual tailoring of software functionality is performed for each user group, then customization accuracy is high, but the administrative effort and time required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctionality customization accuracyVSAvoidadministrative setup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service tailoring by automatically classifying users into maturity levels and dynamically configuring their interfaces based on predefined maturity level definitions. This eliminates the need for manual, time-consuming customization for each user group, as the system autonomously adapts functionality based on user classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of interface complexity dynamically based on user maturity level parameters. By establishing maturity levels as configurable parameters with associated feature sets, the system can automatically adjust the software presentation without manual tailoring, reducing administrative time while maintaining customization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8635592B1Method and system for tailoring software functionality
Publication Date: 2014.01.21 PLANVIEW
  • US8635592B1 patent drawing
  • US8635592B1 patent drawing
  • US8635592B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for tailoring the functionality of software applications are disclosed. Specifically, embodiments of the present invention may tailor the functionality of a software application by tailoring the features of the interfaces of the software application presented to a user based on one or more maturity levels of the user. In this manner, the set of features, and thus the functionality or complexity of a software application, may be tailored to the maturity levels of a user.