Software Object Memory Layout Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Developers of software programs often create objects and data structures without considering memory alignment, leading to sub-optimal execution and increased memory consumption due to unnecessary padding, which reduces cache utilization and inefficiently uses memory.

Innovation Solution

A system that determines the structure and execution context of a software program to identify inefficient memory usage in object instances, generates refactored memory layouts, and provides visualizations to suggest improvements, allowing for potential memory savings calculations and rankings of object instances by savings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If developers declare fields without considering alignment requirements, then the software program is easier to write and maintain, but memory consumption increases due to unnecessary padding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of writing softwareVSAvoidmemory consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of field declarations and automatically determines optimal field ordering and padding placement before the software is compiled and executed. This preliminary action allows developers to write code without worrying about memory layout while the system pre-calculates the optimal arrangement to minimize padding and memory consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables the software to self-optimize its memory layout by automatically analyzing field declarations, determining alignment requirements, and generating optimized memory layouts without requiring developer intervention. The system services itself by identifying and resolving its own memory inefficiencies through automated analysis and transformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Speed

If padding is added to satisfy alignment requirements, then memory access efficiency improves, but memory consumption increases due to unused space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory access efficiencyVSAvoidmemory consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters of field ordering and padding placement by analyzing different possible arrangements and selecting the optimal configuration that minimizes total memory consumption while maintaining alignment requirements. It dynamically adjusts the memory layout parameters based on field types, sizes, and alignment constraints to achieve the best trade-off between access efficiency and memory usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different padding strategies to different regions of the data structure based on local alignment requirements. Instead of uniformly adding padding throughout, it selectively places padding only where necessary to satisfy specific field alignment constraints, thereby minimizing overall padding while maintaining memory access efficiency for each field.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If field ordering is optimized for memory efficiency, then memory consumption decreases, but the complexity of determining optimal ordering increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory consumptionVSAvoidcomplexity of determining field ordering
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical field ordering with an automated computational analysis system. Instead of requiring developers to manually arrange fields based on knowledge of alignment rules and memory optimization techniques, the system uses automated algorithms to analyze field declarations, calculate alignment requirements, and determine optimal ordering, thereby reducing the complexity burden on developers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary analysis layer between field declaration and compilation. This intermediary automatically processes field declarations, determines optimal ordering and padding placement, and generates the optimized layout without requiring the developer to directly engage with the complex ordering decisions. The intermediary handles the complexity while presenting a simple interface to the developer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10353793B2Identifying improvements to memory usage of software programs
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US10353793B2 patent drawing
  • US10353793B2 patent drawing
  • US10353793B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed embodiments provide a system that facilitates the execution of a software program. During operation, the system determines a structure of a software program and an execution context for the software program from a set of possible execution contexts for the software program, wherein the software program includes one or more object instances. Next, the system uses the structure and the execution context to identify a portion of an object instance from the one or more object instances that is determined to inefficiently use memory space in the software program. The system then provides a refactoring of the object instance that reduces use of the memory space in the object instance.