Software Performance Evaluation Across Safety-Critical Environments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for ensuring software reliability fail to account for the unique relationship between software and multiple environments, leading to potential human harm in safety-critical scenarios.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that includes a processor and memory to receive a software package, identify a safety standard, select an operating environment, deploy the software, and determine performance metrics through a communication channel, displaying the results to a user.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current systems are used to ensure software reliability, then the reliability evaluation is limited to few environments, but comprehensive environment coverage is needed to understand unique software-environment relationships

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware reliabilityVSAvoidenvironment coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs multiple virtualization technologies (VMs, containers, sandboxes) that can simulate diverse operating environments within a single evaluation platform. This allows the software reliability evaluation system to function across multiple environments simultaneously, resolving the contradiction between maintaining reliability assessment accuracy and expanding environment coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates virtual copies of different operating environments through virtualization techniques. Instead of requiring physical hardware for each environment, the system generates virtual representations (virtual machines, containerized environments, sandboxed instances) that replicate target environment behaviors, enabling comprehensive multi-environment evaluation without proportionally increasing physical resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If software is monitored in multiple environments, then unique software-environment relationships are understood, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware reliability assessmentVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces virtualization layers as intermediaries between the physical hardware and the software under evaluation. These virtual environments act as mediators that isolate and control specific environment parameters, allowing systematic evaluation of software-environment relationships without directly managing the complexity of multiple physical systems. The intermediary layer abstracts and standardizes environment provisioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation system segments the software testing process into isolated virtual environments (VMs, containers, sandboxes), each configured with specific parameters. This segmentation allows independent management and configuration of each test environment, reducing overall system complexity by breaking down the monolithic evaluation process into manageable, reusable modular units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If performance metrics are determined through communication channels, then software performance is evaluated, but potential performance degradation in critical settings may be missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance evaluation capabilityVSAvoidsafety-critical operation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system varies critical parameters such as communication bandwidth, latency, and packet loss rates across different virtual environments to simulate degraded network conditions. By systematically changing these parameters, the system evaluates software performance under stress conditions that mirror safety-critical scenarios, preventing oversight of potential reliability issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively introduces adverse conditions (network delays, interruptions, resource constraints) into the virtual test environments before actual deployment. This preliminary exposure to harmful factors allows identification and correction of software vulnerabilities under stress, preventing failures in safety-critical operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS20260079814A1Apparatus and method for evaluating software performance
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 PARRY LABS LLC
  • US20260079814A1 patent drawing
  • US20260079814A1 patent drawing
  • US20260079814A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein is an apparatus and method for evaluating software performance. An apparatus may include at least a processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least processor, wherein the memory contains instructions configuring the at least processor to receive a software package; identify a safety standard; select an operating environment as a function of the safety standard; deploy the software package on the operating environment; operate a communication channel between a user device and the operating environment, wherein operating the communication channel comprises determining a performance metric for the software package; and displaying, at a display device having a user interface, the performance metric to a user through the user interface.