Software Porting Effort Prediction Across Disparate Platforms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current solutions fail to accurately predict the work effort required for porting software projects across disparate platforms due to the inability to account for the complexities of phases such as configuring, compiling, linking, code changing, testing, and bug fixing, which are unique to the porting process.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing a plurality of machine learning models to analyze historical data from previously ported software projects, extracting features from these phases, and training models to predict the total work effort needed for porting, including base effort, testing effort, and bug fixing effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional estimation methods are used for porting work effort, then the estimation process is simple, but the prediction accuracy is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework effort prediction accuracyVSAvoidprediction system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the porting work effort prediction into multiple distinct phases (configuring, compiling, linking, code changing, testing, bug fixing), each modeled by separate machine learning algorithms. This segmentation allows accurate capture of phase-specific characteristics while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal prediction framework that handles multiple porting phases and different software projects through a family of machine learning algorithms. The system serves multiple functions: predicting effort for each phase, aggregating total effort, and providing phase-wise breakdowns, all within a unified multi-algorithm architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If multiple machine learning algorithms are used to predict different porting phases, then the prediction accuracy improves, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase-specific work effort prediction accuracyVSAvoidmulti-algorithm system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the prediction task into six separate machine learning algorithms, each dedicated to a specific porting phase. This segmentation enables each algorithm to be optimized for its specific phase characteristics while the overall system complexity is managed through clear modular boundaries and independent training processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by training multiple specialized machine learning algorithms on historical phase-specific data before actual prediction. This pre-training of phase-specific models enables accurate predictions during execution while keeping the runtime system simple, as the complex learning work is completed in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If phase-specific features are extracted and modeled separately, then the work effort estimation precision improves, but the data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework effort estimation precisionVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments feature extraction and processing by porting phase, creating distinct data processing pipelines for configuring, compiling, linking, code changing, testing, and bug fixing. Each phase has its own feature set and processing requirements, enabling precision-tuned analysis while managing complexity through phase-specific processing rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by extracting and processing features specific to each porting phase according to its unique characteristics. Each phase receives customized feature processing tailored to its specific requirements, improving estimation precision for that phase while the overall system manages complexity through localized processing strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250348810A1Predicting Work Effort for Porting Software Projects Across Disparate Platforms
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250348810A1 patent drawing
  • US20250348810A1 patent drawing
  • US20250348810A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Predicting porting work effort is provided. A total porting work effort to port a software project from a source platform to a disparate target platform is predicted using a first porting work effort, a second porting work effort, and a third porting work effort. The software project is ported from the source platform to the disparate target platform based on the total porting work effort being less than a defined maximum porting work effort threshold level.