Software Signature Tracking for Crack Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting and preventing the spread of cracked software are inefficient and lack sufficient control, as they rely on expensive human monitoring and may not effectively prevent unauthorized use or distribution of tampered digital content.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a software signature tracking system that uses a protected security component integrated into the application, which generates and verifies a file signature, and communicates with a secure database to enforce security policies and track software versions, thereby preventing unauthorized use and distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human monitoring methods are used to detect cracked software, then detection capability is provided, but cost and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidefficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The software system automatically generates signatures, monitors itself for tampering, and reports anomalies without requiring human intervention. The security component embedded in the software enables self-detection and self-reporting capabilities, eliminating the need for expensive human monitoring while maintaining high detection reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual human monitoring with an automated electronic system that uses cryptographic hash functions and digital signatures to detect software tampering. This substitution of mechanical human labor with automated computational processes dramatically improves efficiency while maintaining detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If security wrapping tools are integrated into development interface, then ease of manufacture improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming burdenVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security wrapping functionality is merged directly into the software development interface, allowing developers to add protection features through integrated tools rather than separate external processes. This consolidation simplifies the manufacturing process while the modular architecture manages complexity through organized component integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The security wrapping tool is designed as a universal component that can be integrated into various software development environments and interfaces. By creating a multi-functional security layer that works across different development platforms, the system reduces overall complexity through standardization rather than increasing it through customization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If protected security component is integrated into application, then protection effectiveness improves, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidsoftware modification
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The protected security component performs preliminary verification of software integrity through cryptographic signatures before allowing execution. This preemptive check prevents tampered software from running, effectively countering potential attacks before they can succeed while maintaining ease of operation for legitimate software

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The security component acts as an intermediary layer between the user and the application software, verifying signatures and enforcing protection without requiring users to directly interact with security mechanisms. This intermediary approach maintains protection effectiveness while preserving ease of operation for authorized users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If signature verification is performed remotely, then control over cracked software improves, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol effectivenessVSAvoidsignature transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of transmitting the actual software or complete signature data, the system uses cryptographic hash functions to create compact signature representations. These condensed copies contain the essential verification information while minimizing data transmission and reducing information loss risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the software signature into a different parameter form through cryptographic hashing, converting large amounts of data into compact hash values. This parameter transformation maintains verification capability while reducing transmission overhead and minimizing potential information loss during remote communication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8769296B2Software signature tracking
Publication Date: 2014.07.01 ATREUS LABS LLC
  • US8769296B2 patent drawing
  • US8769296B2 patent drawing
  • US8769296B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for preventing unauthorized use of software may be achieved by executing computer-readable code with instructions for recording an indication of at least one selected file of a software application in a memory location accessible to a security component of the software application, in which software application the security component is configured to cause a hash signature of the at least one selected file to be generated in response to a signal arising from use of the software application, hashing the at least one selected file to generate a first file signature, transmitting the first file signature to a secure network-accessible computer memory for storage and subsequent comparison to at least one subsequent file signature generated via operation of the security component on a client device, comparing the first file signature to a second file signature generated by the security component in response to a signal arising from use of the software application on the client device, and disabling the software application on the client device, in response to determining that the first file signature does not match the second file signature.