Configurable Software Stack Pipeline for Candidate Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Identifying the best software stack for a target software item is challenging due to the vast number of possible combinations of software components and their dependencies, which can lead to defects, assembly problems, and deployment issues, making manual testing impractical.

Innovation Solution

A system constructs a pipeline based on pipeline configuration data to automate the identification of a recommended software stack by using configurable pipeline units and search algorithms, such as Monte-Carlo tree-analysis or simulated annealing, to evaluate and select the best software stack for a target computing environment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual testing of all possible software stack combinations is performed, then complete coverage of all dependencies is achieved, but the time and resource requirements become impractical

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware stack compatibilityVSAvoidtesting duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by constructing a search space model that pre-identifies all possible software stack combinations before actual testing begins. This preliminary structuring of the problem space allows subsequent automated evaluation to efficiently navigate through combinations without exhaustive manual testing, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An automated search process acts as an intermediary between the vast space of possible software stack combinations and the final selection. This intermediary systematically evaluates combinations using configurable criteria, replacing manual testing with algorithmic exploration that maintains thoroughness while dramatically reducing time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the number of pipeline units is increased to thoroughly evaluate all software stack candidates, then evaluation completeness is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation thoroughnessVSAvoidpipeline complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pipeline configuration is made dynamic and configurable rather than fixed. Users can adjust the number and type of pipeline units based on specific evaluation needs, allowing the system to adapt its complexity level. This dynamic configuration enables thorough evaluation when needed while avoiding unnecessary complexity for simpler cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows changing parameters of pipeline units such as search algorithms, evaluation criteria, and candidate filtering thresholds. By adjusting these parameters, users can optimize the balance between evaluation thoroughness and pipeline complexity for different software stack evaluation scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If exhaustive analysis of all software stack combinations is performed, then identification accuracy is improved, but resource intensity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware stack identification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and evaluates only the most promising software stack candidates from the full search space using configurable filtering criteria. By taking out and focusing computational resources on high-probability candidates rather than exhaustively analyzing all combinations, the system maintains identification accuracy while significantly reducing resource intensity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial analysis on the full set of candidates by using configurable pipeline units that can stop evaluation early when confidence thresholds are met, or focus computational effort on specific subsets of candidates. This partial action approach achieves sufficient accuracy without the excessive resources required for complete exhaustive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11900093B2Constructing pipelines for implementing a software-stack resolution process
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 RED HAT INC
  • US11900093B2 patent drawing
  • US11900093B2 patent drawing
  • US11900093B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pipeline can be constructed for implementing a software-stack resolution process. For example, a system can receive a request from a client device for a recommended software-stack for a target software item. The system can also receive pipeline configuration data specifying configurable pipeline units to be included in the pipeline. The pipeline can include a search process for identifying and analyzing a group of software-stack candidates associated with the target software item. The system can construct the pipeline using the configurable pipeline units based on the pipeline configuration data. One or more of the configurable pipeline units can be arranged in the pipeline to guide the search process by adjusting one or more parameters of the search process. The system can then execute the pipeline and transmit a response to the client device indicating a recommended software-stack for the target software item.