Automated Software Structure Generation via Placeholder Replacement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In software development, creating a consistent and replicable software program structure is challenging due to varying developer preferences and styles, leading to confusion and inefficiencies when multiple projects with different structures are managed for a single client.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for automating the creation of a software program structure by collecting project inputs, replacing placeholders in the structure and code with specific information, resulting in a fully runnable software code that does not require further editing, using a structure creation module with a placeholder database and processor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If developers create software program structures manually from scratch with personal preferences, then each developer can customize the structure to their style, but the software program structure consistency across different developers and projects deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeveloper customization capabilityVSAvoidsoftware program structure consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining standardized software program structure templates that incorporate best practices and industry standards. These templates are prepared in advance with proper folder hierarchies, file structures, and code patterns, allowing consistent structures to be automatically applied across all projects without requiring developers to manually create them each time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by replicating proven software program structure templates across multiple projects and teams. Instead of each developer creating unique structures, the same validated templates are copied and instantiated throughout the organization, ensuring uniformity while allowing customization through template parameters such as project names, team identifiers, and specific technology stack choices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple projects with different software program structures are delivered to one client, then each project can be optimized for its specific requirements, but the client management efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject-specific optimizationVSAvoidclient management efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements universality by creating software program structure templates that serve multiple functions and can be adapted to different project types while maintaining a consistent base structure. The templates are designed to be multi-functional, supporting various technologies, team sizes, and project scopes through configurable parameters, allowing the same template framework to serve diverse client needs without creating entirely separate structures for each project.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by allowing dynamic customization of template parameters such as project names, client identifiers, technology stacks, and team configurations. This enables the same underlying template structure to be instantiated with different parameters for each project, maintaining structural consistency while adapting to specific project requirements through simple parameter modification rather than structural redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If developers work on projects with non-uniform software program structures, then each project can have its unique characteristics, but the developer confusion and operational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject uniquenessVSAvoiddeveloper operational ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring software program structures with standardized naming conventions, folder hierarchies, and code patterns before developers begin work. This preliminary setup ensures that when developers access any project, they encounter a familiar, consistent structure regardless of the specific project domain, reducing cognitive load and operational friction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies homogeneity by enforcing uniform software program structure patterns across all projects through standardized templates. All projects follow the same organizational principles, naming conventions, and structural conventions, creating a homogeneous ecosystem that makes it easy for developers to navigate and work across different projects without learning new structure paradigms for each one.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Data Source

PatentUS20240338182A1Automated creation of software program structure having runnable software code
Publication Date: 2024.10.10 INSIGHT DIRECT USA INC
  • US20240338182A1 patent drawing
  • US20240338182A1 patent drawing
  • US20240338182A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of creating a software program structure for a project is presented. A plurality of project inputs are collected, including a type of software program that is to be created and at least one of: client name, application/project name, database server name, database name, username, password, custom message, configuration key, and cache system key. At least one structure placeholder in the software program structure is replaced with first project information dependent upon the plurality of project inputs, and at least one code placeholder in software code of the software program structure with second project information dependent upon the plurality of project inputs. The software program structure for the project is provided, including first project information and software code that include second project information. The software code is fully runnable software code that does not require further editing.