Soil Compaction Device Receiving Sections for Secure Fork Transport

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing soil compaction devices face safety risks during transport due to slipping or tipping off transport pallets, posing a danger to the device and personnel, especially on uneven construction sites.

Innovation Solution

A soil compaction device with receiving sections on its body that allow secure attachment to a lifting fork, eliminating the need for additional lifting devices and ensuring the device remains stable during transport by maintaining its center of gravity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the soil compaction device is transported on a transport pallet in an unsecured state, then the transport process is simple and quick, but the device may slip or tip off the pallet during braking or on uneven roads, causing damage and personal injury

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport simplicityVSAvoidtransport safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The receiving sections are divided into two pairs, with each pair consisting of two spaced-apart recesses. This segmentation allows the lifting fork to engage at multiple discrete points, providing both longitudinal and lateral stabilization without requiring a complex unified structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution transitions from one-dimensional securing (front-to-back) by adding receiving sections on opposite sides of the device. This multi-dimensional arrangement of receiving sections prevents tipping in multiple directions simultaneously, addressing the three-dimensional stability problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If additional lifting devices such as lifting ropes or lifting straps with load hooks are used, then the soil compaction device can be securely lifted and transported, but the device complexity and number of components increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport securityVSAvoidnumber of lifting components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lifting function is merged directly into the soil compaction device structure through the receiving sections. The recesses are integrated into the device housing, eliminating the need for separate lifting devices and reducing the total number of components while maintaining secure lifting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The soil compaction device provides its own lifting interface through the receiving sections, eliminating the need for external lifting equipment. The device serves its own transportation needs by incorporating the lifting attachment points directly into its structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If a transport pallet is used to move the soil compaction device, then the device can be transported, but the center of gravity of the assembly changes, creating a variable tipping moment that reduces transport safety

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport capabilityVSAvoidtipping moment stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The transport pallet is extracted from the transportation system, and the soil compaction device is designed to be lifted and transported directly by the lifting fork. This removal of the intermediate pallet eliminates the variable center of gravity problem while maintaining full transport capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of manufacture

If the receiving sections are formed as separate parts, then the structure can accommodate the compactor easily, but the manufacturing cost and assembly complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural accommodationVSAvoidnumber of separate components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The receiving sections are merged into a single integrated recess structure formed as one piece. This consolidation reduces the number of separate components from multiple discrete receiving sections to a single monolithic structure, simplifying both manufacturing and assembly while maintaining the functional accommodation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP2864548B2Compacting device for soil
Publication Date: 2025.07.09 MTS SCHRODE AG
  • EP2864548B2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2864548B2 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2864548B2 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a soil compaction device (1) comprising a compaction element, for example, a compaction plate (2). According to the invention, the compaction attachment (1) has two interspaced receiving sections (6) for receiving a rigid retaining element (17a, 17b) of a transport means (16).