Non-Contact Soil Density Sensing for Planting Depth Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural implements struggle to maintain consistent soil engagement and depth due to varying soil conditions, particularly in compacted or dense soils, leading to inefficiencies in planting and seed germination.

Innovation Solution

A soil density detection system with non-contact sensors mounted on agricultural implements to detect soil density ahead of the working area, coupled with a control device that adjusts actuator force based on real-time soil density data, allowing for proactive adjustment of downward force to maintain target depth and avoid obstacles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If supplemental downward force is applied to assist tools in reaching desired depth in dense soil, then planting depth consistency is improved, but mechanical wear and tool damage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanting depth consistencyVSAvoidtool durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of soil density conditions ahead of the planting implement and proactively adjusts the supplemental downward force before the tools engage the soil. This anticipatory adjustment prevents excessive force application in hard soils and reduces unnecessary mechanical stress on tools, thereby reducing wear and damage while maintaining planting depth consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors soil density conditions and provides real-time feedback to the actuator control. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows the system to dynamically adjust the supplemental downward force based on actual soil conditions, preventing over-application of force that would cause tool damage while ensuring adequate force for maintaining depth consistency in varying soil conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If non-contact sensors are used to detect soil density ahead of the implement, then tool damage is prevented, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool damage preventionVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical contact sensors with non-contact sensors that detect soil density conditions without physical interaction. This substitution eliminates wear and damage to sensing components while providing advance detection of soil conditions. The non-contact nature of the sensors reduces mechanical complexity compared to systems requiring physical soil engagement for measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The non-contact sensors act as an intermediary between the soil conditions and the control system, providing information about soil density without direct contact. This intermediary approach allows the system to gather necessary data while avoiding the mechanical complexity and vulnerability associated with contact-based sensing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If real-time adjustments of downforce are made based on soil conditions, then planting efficiency is improved, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanting efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously receives feedback from soil density sensors and automatically adjusts the supplemental downward force in real-time. This feedback-driven control enables the system to optimize planting efficiency by applying appropriate force for each soil condition without requiring complex manual intervention or overly sophisticated control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed to autonomously monitor soil conditions and self-adjust the downforce without external intervention. This self-service capability simplifies the control architecture by eliminating the need for complex operator interfaces or manual adjustment mechanisms, thereby improving planting efficiency while keeping the control system relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP4233504B1Combination of a soil density detection system and agricultural implement
Publication Date: 2025.11.05 DEERE & CO
  • EP4233504B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4233504B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4233504B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A combination of a soil density detection system (100, 300) and agricultural implement is disclosed. The combination, comprising: at least one non-contact soil-density sensing device (101, 422) disposed on the agricultural implement, the soil-density sensing device (101, 422) operably detecting soil density in at least a portion of a target area in front of a ground contact portion of said agricultural implement to generate data indicative of a detected soil density; and a control device (400) operatively coupled with the at least one soil-density sensing device (101), the control device (400) comprising: a processor (402) for processing data and programming; a memory device (404) operatively coupled with the processor (402) to operably store data and programming; and soil density detection logic (406a) stored as programming in the memory device (404), the soil density detection logic (406a) being executable by the processor (402) to determine the soil density throughout the target area based at least upon the sensed soil density data, wherein the control device (400) is configured to generate data indicative of the soil density detected throughout the target area.