Soil Modification Apparatus Tracks for Wet Subgrade Traction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Construction on wet subgrades is challenging due to machinery entrenchment and rut formation, delaying projects and increasing costs, as existing soil modification apparatuses often become stuck or create deep ruts, and their weight exacerbates the issue.

Innovation Solution

A soil modification apparatus with tracks instead of wheels for improved traction, a larger hopper to minimize refilling stops, and adjustable weights to maintain balance during material distribution, allowing for efficient spreading of soil modification material without becoming entrenched or creating ruts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If heavy machinery is used to spread soil modification material on wet subgrades, then the material can be distributed efficiently, but the machinery becomes entrenched or stuck in the saturated ground

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial distribution efficiencyVSAvoidmachinery mobility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The apparatus divides the heavy machinery system into multiple support points through tracks with multiple rollers, distributing the weight across numerous contact points with the ground rather than a few wheels, reducing pressure on the wet subgrade

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from point contact (wheels) to linear contact (tracks) by adding a dimensional element, creating a continuous surface that distributes weight along the length of the track rather than at discrete wheel contact points

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the soil modification apparatus uses a larger hopper to reduce refilling stops, then continuous operation is improved, but the increased weight exacerbates entrenchment in wet subgrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operation capabilityVSAvoidapparatus weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The hopper is divided into multiple compartments or sections that can be independently supported by the track system, allowing the weight to be distributed across the track length rather than concentrated at a single location

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The track system provides counterbalancing support through its distributed roller configuration, where the cumulative support force of multiple rollers counteracts the increased weight of the larger hopper, preventing entrenchment despite the weight increase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Reliability

If the apparatus uses tracks instead of wheels for improved traction, then mobility on wet subgrades is enhanced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction capabilityVSAvoidlocomotion system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the simple wheel-axle mechanical system with a track-roller system that uses distributed rolling contact instead of rotating wheels, substituting a more complex mechanism that provides superior traction through increased surface contact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The track system uses flexible or semi-rigid track links that can conform to the ground surface, providing adaptive contact similar to flexible shells, allowing the apparatus to navigate uneven wet subgrade surfaces more effectively than rigid wheels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Productivity

If heavy machinery passes over wet subgrades to spread material, then soil modification can be performed, but deep ruts are created that prevent subsequent machinery from passing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoil modification capabilityVSAvoidrut formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The track system segments the contact area into multiple small contact patches along the track length, distributing the load across many points rather than creating concentrated pressure zones that form deep ruts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The track system dynamically adapts to ground conditions through the flexibility of track links and rollers, allowing the apparatus to adjust its weight distribution in real-time to minimize ground disturbance and rut formation while maintaining mobility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10669685B1Soil modification apparatuses and methods of using the same
Publication Date: 2020.06.02 HOGAN CHRISTOPHER
  • US10669685B1 patent drawing
  • US10669685B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses are configured to modify wet subgrades prepare the same for constructions, namely for building roads and/or buildings thereon. The soil modification apparatuses spread mineral material from a truck having increased traction for maneuvering over the wet subgrades. Methods of using the same are further provided.