Solar Stratospheric Glider Structure for Long-Endurance Flight

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solar-powered stratospheric gliders face challenges in achieving sustained, long-term flight with lightweight and durable designs that can accommodate various payloads and require complex, costly systems with limited reusability.

Innovation Solution

A solar-powered stratospheric glider with a modular design, triangular cross-section fuselages, carbon fiber spars, and a sacrificial landing system using downward winglets and hinged tails to ensure durability and reusability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If a solar-powered stratospheric glider uses a modular design with lightweight materials, then weight is reduced and energy efficiency is improved, but structural strength and durability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglider weightVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The glider utilizes carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite materials for the fuselage and wing structures. These composite materials provide high strength-to-weight ratio, maintaining structural integrity while minimizing weight. The triangular cross-section fuselage design further enhances structural rigidity through geometric stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The glider employs a modular design where the fuselage is divided into separate sections that can be assembled and disassembled. This segmentation allows for easier maintenance and repair while using lightweight materials, as damaged sections can be replaced without compromising the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the glider uses a sacrificial landing system with downward winglets and hinged tails, then durability and reusability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereusabilityVSAvoidlanding system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The glider incorporates sacrificial landing gear components, specifically downward-winglets and hinged tails, that are designed to be replaced after a limited number of landings. These components absorb impact stress and can be easily swapped out, extending the operational life of the main airframe while keeping the replacement parts simple and cost-effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The hinged tail design allows the tail section to pivot and absorb landing impact dynamically. This mechanical flexibility reduces stress on the main fuselage structure, improving durability without requiring overly complex shock absorption systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Duration of action of moving object

If the glider is designed for sustained long-term flight, then duration of action is improved, but weight and structural requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight durationVSAvoidglider weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The glider utilizes periodic solar energy input from sunlight to recharge its battery system during flight. This allows the glider to sustain long-term operation by cycling between battery power and solar recharging, extending flight duration without proportionally increasing weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The glider features an enlarged triangular cross-section fuselage that provides optimized structural strength distribution. This local geometric enhancement provides the necessary structural integrity for long-term flight while minimizing overall weight compared to a uniformly reinforced design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If the glider uses carbon fiber spars and triangular cross-section fuselages, then structural strength is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The carbon fiber spar structure is divided into modular sections that can be manufactured separately and assembled. This segmentation simplifies the manufacturing process by allowing standardization of components while maintaining the high strength-to-weight ratio of carbon fiber construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The triangular cross-section fuselage is constructed using composite material techniques that leverage the geometric stability of the triangular shape. This design provides enhanced structural strength while using manufacturing processes that are relatively straightforward for composite structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The glider achieves sustained flight with improved energy efficiency, reduced weight, and enhanced durability, allowing for adaptable use in multiple applications with minimal maintenance and repair time.

Implementation Method 1

solar-powered stratospheric glider

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotovoltaic effect: Photovoltaic Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20260070686A1Solar powered stratospheric glider
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 SOLARIS SUBORBITAL INC
  • US20260070686A1 patent drawing
  • US20260070686A1 patent drawing
  • US20260070686A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A glider system capable of sustained long-term flight includes a fixed-wing glider having a dual fuselage system. The top surface of the glider is covered with a plurality of photovoltaic cells capable of powering onboard sensors, propeller systems, and/or onboard processers. The glider includes wing spars with a composite material covering an inner foam core, with the type of foam core or use of reinforcement materials differs along the length or width of the wing spars. The glider is able to downward facing sacrificial winglets to provide a landing system without the need for bulkier landing gear.