Methods and systems for mounting solar panel frames

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solar panel frames face challenges in efficiently connecting to racking systems, requiring improved attachment, integration, and installation processes while maintaining durability and reducing costs.

Innovation Solution

A mounting system for solar panels featuring a frame with a first support structure and attachment features that engage the frame, allowing for improved attachment to racking systems, enhanced integration with accessories, and simplified installation, while utilizing magnetic properties for monitoring and improved durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional mounting systems are used for solar panels, then the panels can be installed on racking systems, but the attachment process is complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment processVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting system is divided into separate modular components: a mounting bracket attached to the racking system, and a corresponding attachment feature on the frame that interfaces with the bracket. This segmentation allows for easier handling and installation of individual components while reducing overall installation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A mounting bracket serves as an intermediary component between the racking system and the frame. The bracket simplifies the attachment process by providing a standardized interface that connects to both the racking structure and the frame's attachment feature, reducing the complexity of direct attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Power

If solar panels are made larger to increase energy output, then more power is generated, but the panels become heavier and more difficult to handle and install

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy outputVSAvoidpanel weight
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is divided into multiple sections with attachment features distributed along its length. This segmentation allows the frame to support larger panel sizes while distributing the weight load across multiple mounting points, making handling and installation more manageable despite increased size and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The attachment features extend through the frame sidewall thickness, creating a three-dimensional engagement with the mounting bracket. This dimensional approach provides enhanced mechanical strength and stability, allowing larger, heavier panels to be securely mounted without increasing the complexity of installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Strength

If the frame structure is strengthened to support larger panels, then durability is improved, but the manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe durabilityVSAvoidframe structure
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frame structure uses standardized cross-sectional profiles with integrated attachment features that are repeated at regular intervals. This segmentation approach maintains manufacturing simplicity through repetition of standard components while providing the structural strength needed to support larger panels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The frame's cross-sectional structure is designed to serve multiple functions: it provides structural support, contains the panel, and includes integrated attachment features for mounting. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional components, simplifying both manufacturing and assembly while maintaining durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If attachment features are added to the frame, then the connection to racking systems is improved, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment connectionVSAvoidframe manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment feature is merged into the frame's cross-sectional structure as an integrated component rather than a separate attachment element. This combining of functions allows the frame to be manufactured as a single piece with the attachment feature formed during the extrusion or shaping process, maintaining manufacturing simplicity while providing reliable connection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The frame's cross-sectional profile is designed to serve multiple purposes: structural support, panel containment, and attachment to the racking system. This universal design approach allows a single manufacturing process to produce all necessary features, reducing complexity while improving connection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12566014B2Methods and systems for mounting solar panel frames
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 NEXTPOWER LLC
  • US12566014B2 patent drawing
  • US12566014B2 patent drawing
  • US12566014B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mounting system may be provided for a solar panel and may include a frame having a first frame section and a first support structure. The first frame section may include an elongated piece of framework material having a first end and a second end, wherein the first and second ends define a lengthwise dimension. A lengthwise fold may define an intersection of a frame sidewall with a bottom flange, wherein at least a portion the frame sidewall extends above the bottom flange. A first wall opening may be provided in the frame sidewall. A panel containment structure may be provided at an upper portion of the frame sidewall and may include a lower shelf extending from the frame sidewall. The panel containment structure may engage a bottom surface of the solar panel at a first panel edge area.