Solar Panel Layout Calculator for Roof Seam Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual process of installing solar panels on a building's roof is time-consuming and prone to errors due to the need to consider various factors such as roof size, shape, material, environmental conditions, and local building codes, with no efficient method to calculate optimal layouts and hardware requirements.

Innovation Solution

A computing system that receives input parameters, obtains aerial images of the roof, and calculates a layout for solar panels, aligning them with roof seams to avoid drilling, using structural information and building codes to determine necessary hardware and locations, generating reports for installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual calculation methods are used for solar panel layout, then flexibility in considering various roof and environmental factors is maintained, but the process becomes time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of layout calculationVSAvoidtime for layout calculation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical calculation methods with an automated computing system that processes roof data, solar panel specifications, and environmental factors to generate layout calculations, thereby eliminating time-consuming manual computations while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing users to input their own roof and project parameters, which the computing system then automatically processes to generate layout recommendations, reducing both time and potential human error

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If solar panels are installed without aligning with roof seams, then installation speed increases, but drilling into the roof is required which compromises roof integrity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation speedVSAvoidroof integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculation of the solar panel layout before installation, determining optimal positions that align with roof seams in advance, so that installers can directly mount panels without drilling, thus maintaining both speed and roof integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by identifying specific locations on the roof where seam alignment is possible and adjusting the layout accordingly, allowing drilling-free installation at those specific locations while maintaining overall layout efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Area of stationary object

If gap between adjacent solar panels is reduced to maximize roof coverage, then energy generation area increases, but thermal expansion of panels is restricted causing potential damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroof coverage areaVSAvoidpanel structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates thermal expansion calculations into the layout design, determining appropriate gap sizes between panels that accommodate expected thermal expansion and contraction cycles, preventing structural damage while maximizing usable coverage area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #37Thermal expansion

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adjusts the gap parameter between panels based on calculated thermal expansion requirements, optimizing the balance between maximizing coverage area and maintaining panel structural integrity under varying temperature conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If extensive manual lookup of specifications and codes is performed, then compliance with building codes is ensured, but the process becomes complex and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance with building codesVSAvoidcomplexity of installation process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computing system performs multiple functions including data collection, layout calculation, hardware determination, and code compliance verification in a single integrated process, reducing complexity while maintaining comprehensive compliance checking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where calculated layouts are automatically checked against building codes and specifications, with iterative adjustment of parameters to ensure compliance, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing manual verification complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20220335176A1Solar calculator
Publication Date: 2022.10.20 RMH TECH LLC
  • US20220335176A1 patent drawing
  • US20220335176A1 patent drawing
  • US20220335176A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to a solar calculator which can calculate a layout for a set of solar panels to be installed on a roof of a building. Generally speaking, the solar calculator can receive as input a roof type for the building, system requirements, site information, specifications for mounting hardware to be used, specifications for the solar panels to be used, wind data for the location of the building, etc. From this data, the solar calculator can then calculate the number of solar panels needed, a layout for the panels on the roof, the hardware required to mount the panels, locations for the hardware to be installed, and/or other information. A graphical and/or textual report can then be generated that describes the layout of the solar panels and hardware, a bill of materials for the installation, and other information.