Solar Panel with Pivoting Side Supports for Reduced Installation Cost

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in the solar panel industry is to reduce installation time and costs while maintaining structural integrity and efficiency, particularly for flat roof installations, where existing solar panels require significant labor and materials, leading to increased expenses.

Innovation Solution

The development of photovoltaic modules with repositionable side supports that can be folded for compact shipping and easy mounting, allowing for efficient stacking and reduced labor costs, while maintaining structural integrity through electrical grounding and adjustable height attachments for uneven surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional fixed side supports are used on solar panels, then structural integrity is maintained, but shipping volume increases and installation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation speedVSAvoidsupport structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The side supports are designed to pivot between a horizontal shipping position and a vertical installation position. This dynamic reconfiguration allows the same structure to serve dual purposes: compact stacking during transport and proper structural support during installation, eliminating the need for separate configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure is divided into modular side supports that can be independently positioned and configured. Each side support acts as an independent unit that can pivot and lock into place, allowing for simplified assembly and reduced installation complexity while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Volume of stationary object

If solar panels are shipped with side supports in extended position, then structural integrity is maintained, but shipping volume and transportation costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshipping volumeVSAvoidpanel structural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The side supports pivot to a horizontal position during shipping, reducing the overall panel assembly volume and allowing for more efficient stacking. The same supports then pivot to a vertical position during installation to provide the necessary structural strength, dynamically adapting to different operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The side supports are designed to nest against the panel frame when in the horizontal shipping position, maximizing compactness. During installation, they pivot outward to their functional position, providing structural support without requiring additional space during transport.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Loss of time

If traditional installation methods are used, then structural integrity is ensured, but labor costs and installation time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation timeVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The side supports are pre-configured in a compact horizontal position during manufacturing and shipping. This preliminary configuration eliminates the need for complex assembly steps during installation - installers simply pivot the supports to their vertical position and secure them, dramatically reducing installation time and labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The pivoting side supports are designed to be self-aligning and self-securing through their mechanical pivot mechanism. The supports automatically assume their correct vertical position when activated, reducing the need for precise manual alignment and complex fastening procedures, thereby simplifying the installation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Strength

If thick frames are used to strengthen solar panels, then structural integrity is improved, but material costs and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel strengthVSAvoidpanel weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using permanently thick frames, the patent employs thin frames combined with dynamic pivoting side supports. The supports provide structural strength only when needed in the vertical installation position, allowing the frame itself to be lighter while maintaining overall panel strength during both shipping and installation phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10594254B2Methods and systems for solar panel with pivoting side supports
Publication Date: 2020.03.17 PATTON ENGINEERING INC
  • US10594254B2 patent drawing
  • US10594254B2 patent drawing
  • US10594254B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A folded down support (12) allows for stronger solar panels (10) and the support replaces most of the solar racking required for solar installation which further reduces the cost of the photovoltaic solar system. The solar panels (10) can be arranged so that solar panels form a solar collector solar panel array. The solar panel (10) can be set on a surface by itself or with ballast (43). It can also be attached to the surface by fastening the solar panel to the side supports. If the solar panel frame and supports are electrically conductive, the design allows for self electrical grounding between these conductive parts when the side supports are pivoted to the down position. The folded up support allows for high density storage and shipping.