Solid Angle Charge Modeling for Electrophysiology Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electrophysiological modeling and simulation techniques face inefficiencies and inaccuracies due to the need to handle singularities and complex geometries, particularly in calculating charge distributions across interfaces between different materials, which increases computational resources and complexity.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of the solid angle process, flattened calculation cell process, and bound charge/free charge process, which allow for reduced calculation cells, efficient computation, and accurate modeling by using solid angles to calculate charge movements and dielectric effects without initial electrical potential determination, and alternating determination of bound and free charge distributions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional electrophysiological modeling techniques are used to calculate charge distributions across interfaces between different materials, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to the need to handle singularities and complex geometries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge distribution calculation accuracyVSAvoidmodeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the calculation domain into discrete calculation cells with simplified geometries (e.g., cubic cells). By dividing the complex electrophysiological system into many small, simple cells, the method avoids the need to directly handle complex interfaces and singularities while maintaining calculation accuracy through the collective representation of charge distributions across all cells.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational framework that uses solid angle calculations as a mediator between the physical charge distributions and the computational model. Instead of directly calculating potentials at singular interfaces, the method uses solid angles subtended by calculation cell faces at charge locations as an intermediary quantity that naturally handles interface problems without singularities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional methods are used to model complex geometries in electrophysiological systems, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity decreases due to increased computational resources required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometry representation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Complex geometries are represented by segmenting them into assemblies of simple calculation cells (e.g., cubic cells arranged in grids). This segmentation allows accurate representation of complex shapes through the collective arrangement of simple elements, while each individual cell maintains simple geometry that is computationally efficient to handle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses simplified cubic calculation cells as computational copies that represent more complex physical structures. Instead of directly modeling complex geometries with their inherent computational difficulties, the method uses arrays of simple cubic cells that copy the essential geometric and electrical properties needed for accurate electrophysiological modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If the number of calculation cells is increased to improve modeling accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to longer computation times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates unnecessary calculation cells from the model. By analyzing which cells actually contribute to the charge distribution and potential calculations, the method removes cells that would not affect the results, thereby reducing the total number of cells needed while maintaining modeling accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the computational parameters by using solid angle calculations instead of traditional potential-based methods. This parameter change allows for more efficient computation where fewer cells are needed to achieve the same accuracy, as the solid angle method naturally converges faster and requires less computational effort per cell.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11749382B2Computer-implemented tools for use in electrophysiology
Publication Date: 2023.09.05 KLEE MAURICE M
  • US11749382B2 patent drawing
  • US11749382B2 patent drawing
  • US11749382B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Improved computer-implemented tools for use in modeling/simulating spatial charge distributions for electrophysiological systems are provided. The improvements are in three areas: (1) the use of solid angles to calculate quantities of free charge and/or bound charge in calculation cells and/or the movement of quantities of free charge across one or more faces of a calculation cell; (2) the use of flattened calculations cells having only two faces with substantial areas as seen from the free charge and/or the bound charge of the electrophysiological system; and (3) the use of at least two spatial charge distributions, specifically, at least one for bound charge and at least one for free charge, so as to include the effects of relative dielectric constants greater than 1.0 for part or all of an electrophysiological system. The three improvements can be used individually or in combinations.