Solid Bladder Ureteral Stent Design for Reflux Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ureteral stents cause discomfort and medical issues due to their design, which leads to urinary reflux, flank pain, and increased patient discomfort, as they keep ureter orifices open, preventing normal urine flow and irritating bladder tissues.

Innovation Solution

A ureteral stent design featuring a solid bladder portion without a lumen, a tubular kidney portion, and tethers connecting them, allowing the bladder portion to float and the ureter orifice to move between compressed and uncompressed states, ensuring urine flows only from the kidney to the bladder, reducing reflux and irritation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a conventional ureteral stent with a lumen is used, then the stent can maintain structural integrity and provide support, but it prevents the ureter orifice from moving between compressed and uncompressed states, causing urinary reflux and flank pain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestent structural integrityVSAvoidurinary reflux and flank pain
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The bladder portion is constructed as a solid structure without a lumen, allowing the ureter orifice to move freely between compressed and uncompressed states. This solid yet flexible construction maintains stent integrity while enabling natural orifice movement to prevent urinary reflux and flank pain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a solid bladder portion without a lumen is used, then the ureter orifice can move freely between compressed and uncompressed states, but the bladder portion requires a larger diameter to maintain necessary uncoil force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveurinary reflux preventionVSAvoidbladder portion diameter
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The bladder portion diameter is optimized to balance two requirements: large enough to maintain necessary uncoil force for stent support, yet small enough to allow insertion into a scope alongside a pusher tube. This parameter optimization enables free movement of the ureter orifice to prevent urinary reflux while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If the bladder portion diameter is increased to maintain uncoil force, then the stent can provide adequate support, but it cannot be inserted into a scope alongside a pusher tube, complicating the delivery process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuncoil forceVSAvoiddelivery process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The bladder portion diameter is precisely controlled to maintain adequate uncoil force for stent support while remaining small enough to fit within the delivery scope alongside the pusher tube. This optimized diameter simplifies the delivery process, allowing the stent to be inserted through standard ureteroscopes without requiring separate guidewire loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If the bladder portion is loaded onto a guidewire, then the stent can be delivered through the ureteral passageway, but the delivery process becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery capabilityVSAvoiddelivery process time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The design eliminates the need to load the bladder portion onto a guidewire by optimizing its diameter to fit alongside the pusher tube within the delivery scope. This extraction of the guidewire loading step simplifies the delivery process and reduces procedural time while maintaining the capability to deliver the stent through the ureteral passageway.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20220008187A1Ureteral stent for placement in a kidney and bladder
Publication Date: 2022.01.13 UNIV HOSPITALS HEALTH SYST
  • US20220008187A1 patent drawing
  • US20220008187A1 patent drawing
  • US20220008187A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a ureteral stent for placement in a bladder, a kidney and a ureteral passageway connecting the bladder and the kidney. The ureteral stent includes a solid bladder portion free of a lumen positionable in the bladder, a tubular kidney portion positionable in the kidney and the ureteral passageway, and a tether connecting the bladder portion and the ureter portion to allow the bladder portion to float in the bladder and to allow a ureter orifice connecting the ureteral passageway to the bladder to move between a compressed state and an uncompressed state. By not having a lumen, the solid bladder portion allows the bladder to have a smaller diameter while maintaining a necessary uncoil force. The smaller diameter also allows the bladder portion to be inserted into a scope alongside a pusher tube, thereby avoiding loading the bladder portion onto a guidewire.