Solid Catalyst Processing of Polyolefins at Low Temperatures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current chemical recycling methods for plastic waste, such as pyrolysis, are energy-intensive, have a large carbon footprint, and require high temperatures, making them inefficient and costly for processing polyolefins.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical recycling process that involves contacting solid polyolefins with a solid catalyst and agitating them at low temperatures under an air atmosphere to produce olefin-containing hydrocarbon polymers, reducing energy consumption and environmental impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pyrolysis is used to convert plastic waste to hydrocarbon fuels, then chemical recycling is achieved, but energy consumption increases and carbon footprint enlarges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical recycling efficacyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the temperature parameter from high (500-1000°C pyrolysis) to low (below 100°C) by introducing a solid catalyst that enables chemical recycling at ambient or near-ambient temperatures, dramatically reducing energy consumption while maintaining recycling efficacy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

A solid catalyst acts as an intermediary substance that facilitates the chemical recycling process at low temperatures. The catalyst enables the conversion of plastic waste to hydrocarbon fuels without requiring high thermal energy input, thus resolving the contradiction between recycling effectiveness and energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If pyrolysis is used for plastic waste conversion, then hydrocarbon fuels are produced, but the process requires high temperatures of 500°C to 1000°C

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrocarbon fuel productionVSAvoidprocess temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally changes the temperature parameter from 500-1000°C to below 100°C by employing a solid catalyst that lowers the activation energy barrier, enabling hydrocarbon fuel production at temperatures that were previously considered too low for such conversions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If conventional pyrolysis is used, then plastic waste is converted to fuels, but catalyst coking occurs at elevated temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel production rateVSAvoidcatalyst coking
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By changing the temperature parameter to below 100°C, the patent eliminates the thermal conditions that cause catalyst coking while maintaining productive fuel conversion through the catalytic action of the solid catalyst at low temperatures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If pyrolysis is used for chemical recycling, then a relatively large carbon footprint is generated, but waste-to-value conversion is achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewaste conversion efficiencyVSAvoidcarbon footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the temperature parameter from high to low (below 100°C), which fundamentally reduces the energy input required for the process. This lower energy consumption directly translates to a reduced carbon footprint while maintaining effective waste-to-value conversion through catalytic action

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for the efficient production of olefin-containing hydrocarbon polymers with carbon-carbon double bonds, enabling further processing and recycling of plastics with reduced energy costs and environmental impact compared to traditional pyrolysis methods.

Implementation Method 1

contacting solid polyolefins with a solid catalyst to form a reaction mixture. The solid catalyst may be chosen from a zeolite, a microporous aluminosilicate, an alumina, or combinations thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

mechanically agitating the reaction mixture to produce olefin-containing hydrocarbon polymers. The use of such mechanical recycling process has advantages over conventional chemical recycling processes for recycling polyolefins, such as pyrolysis, because mechanical agitation is used to drive the reaction forward instead of heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanochemistry:

Data Source

PatentUS11898019B2Methods for processing polyolefins
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO
  • US11898019B2 patent drawing
  • US11898019B2 patent drawing
  • US11898019B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for processing polyolefins may include contacting solid polyolefins with a solid catalyst to form a reaction mixture. The solid catalyst may be chosen from a zeolite, a microporous aluminosilicate, an alumina, or combinations thereof. The solid polyolefins may be chosen from polyethylene, polypropylene, or combinations thereof. The method may include mechanically agitating the reaction mixture to produce olefin-containing hydrocarbon polymers and separating the olefin-containing hydrocarbon polymers from the solid catalyst. The olefin-containing hydrocarbon polymers include a carbon-carbon double bond in the backbone of the hydrocarbon polymers.