Autonomous Lane Change Control Across Solid Lines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous driving technologies lack flexibility in adapting to various traffic scenarios, particularly in situations requiring lane changes across solid lines, which limits their capability in emergency avoidance and personalized driver intentions.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control method and apparatus that includes a cross-solid-line lane change permission switch, allowing the vehicle to change lanes when enabled by the driver's operation and adjusted road condition parameters, while providing prompts to ensure safe lane changes and respecting driver intentions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous driving technology strictly follows traffic rules to forbid crossing solid lines, then safety and rule compliance are improved, but flexibility in emergency avoidance and adapting to diverse traffic scenarios deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety and rule complianceVSAvoidflexibility in emergency avoidance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by introducing a cross-solid-line lane change permission switch that dynamically adjusts the vehicle's lane changing behavior. When the switch is enabled, the vehicle can cross solid lines despite traffic rules; when disabled, it strictly follows rules. This dynamic configuration allows the system to adapt between safety compliance and emergency flexibility based on driver intent and situational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by modifying the lane changing permission parameter through the cross-solid-line lane change permission switch. By changing this parameter from a fixed state to a configurable state, the system can adjust its behavior to either strictly follow traffic rules or allow emergency lane changes across solid lines, thereby resolving the contradiction between rule compliance and emergency adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Extent of automation

If autonomous driving technology mechanically follows traffic rules without driver intervention, then automation level is improved, but driver intention recognition and personalized requirements deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoiddriver intention recognition
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the feedback principle by incorporating driver operations (such as turn signal switch operations) as feedback inputs to the autonomous driving control system. The system monitors driver actions and uses them to trigger lane change operations, creating a feedback loop that allows driver intentions to influence automated decision-making. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining high automation while incorporating driver intent recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes self-service by enabling the autonomous driving system to automatically execute lane changes based on detected driver operations without requiring explicit continuous commands. Once a driver operation is detected, the system autonomously determines and executes the lane change maneuver, combining automated execution with driver-initiated intent detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If autonomous driving technology allows cross-solid-line lane changes, then flexibility and emergency avoidance capability are improved, but traffic rule compliance and potential safety risks deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility and emergency avoidanceVSAvoidtraffic rule compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by requiring the driver to explicitly enable the cross-solid-line lane change permission switch before the vehicle can cross solid lines. This preliminary configuration action ensures that the system and driver have pre-agreed on the permission status, maintaining traffic rule compliance by default while allowing flexibility when explicitly authorized. The switch state serves as a preliminary condition that must be satisfied before emergency lane changes can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240083438A1Vehicle control method and apparatus, and vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.03.14 YINWANG INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD
  • US20240083438A1 patent drawing
  • US20240083438A1 patent drawing
  • US20240083438A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle control method and apparatus 10, and a vehicle 100 are provided. The vehicle 100 has a cross-solid-line lane change permission switch 16. When the cross-solid-line lane change permission switch 16 is in an on state, and a driver switches a turn signal switch to a state that a left turn signal or a right turn signal is on, the vehicle 100 can cross a solid line to change a lane.