Solid State Binder Composition for Mineral Fibres

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mineral fibre binders are costly, often derived from fossil fuels, and emit formaldehyde, while lacking long-term mechanical strength and eco-friendly properties.

Innovation Solution

A solid-state binder composition combining compounds like ascorbic acid and carbohydrates, which are non-toxic, renewable, and economically priced, eliminating the need for aqueous forms and pre-reactions, and providing excellent bonding properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional phenol-formaldehyde resin binders are used, then good bonding properties are achieved, but formaldehyde emission occurs and cost is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding propertiesVSAvoidformaldehyde emission
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameters of the binder by replacing phenol-formaldehyde resin with a new composition consisting of polyol, isocyanate, and starch or cellulose. This parameter change eliminates formaldehyde emission while maintaining bonding properties through the formation of polyurethane crosslinked structures with starch or cellulose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite binder system combining polyol, isocyanate, and starch or cellulose. This composite material approach integrates the adhesive properties of polyurethane with the renewable, formaldehyde-free characteristics of starch or cellulose, achieving both good bonding and environmental compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If phenol-formaldehyde resin with hardener material is used, then bonding is achieved, but the starting materials are expensive chemicals

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebondingVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces expensive phenol-formaldehyde resin with a more cost-effective binder system based on polyol, isocyanate, and starch or cellulose. The use of starch or cellulose as a renewable, low-cost material significantly reduces the overall binder cost while maintaining adequate bonding performance for mineral wool products.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the economic parameters of binder production by selecting raw materials (polyol, isocyanate, starch/cellulose) that are either commodity chemicals or renewable resources with lower cost compared to phenol-formaldehyde resin and its hardeners, thereby reducing overall manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If conventional binders are used, then bonding is achieved, but most starting materials stem from fossil fuels

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebondingVSAvoidfossil fuel dependency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the origin parameter of the binder materials by replacing fossil fuel-derived phenol-formaldehyde resin with a system incorporating starch or cellulose from renewable plant resources. This parameter change reduces fossil fuel dependency while maintaining bonding functionality through polyurethane-starch/cellulose crosslinking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite binder where starch or cellulose from renewable resources serves as the crosslinking agent, reducing reliance on fossil fuels. The combination of polyol, isocyanate, and biobased starch or cellulose creates a partially renewable binder system that maintains bonding properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If conventional binders are used, then bonding is achieved, but long term mechanical properties are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebondingVSAvoidlong term mechanical properties
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical structure parameters of the cured binder by forming polyurethane crosslinked with starch or cellulose, creating a three-dimensional network structure. This structural parameter change enhances long-term mechanical properties and durability compared to conventional binders, while the crosslinking mechanism ensures stable bonding performance over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The binder composition achieves high mechanical strength, low formaldehyde emission, and cost-effectiveness, with improved long-term performance and eco-friendliness, surpassing conventional binders in reaction loss and aging conditions.

Implementation Method 1

curing the binder composition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

a component (i) in form of one or more compounds selected from compounds of the formula, and any salts thereof... a component (ii) in the form of one or more carbohydrates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrosslinking: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP3341335B1Solid state binder
Publication Date: 2020.06.17 ROCKWOOL INT AS
  • EP3341335B1 patent drawing
  • EP3341335B1 patent drawing
  • EP3341335B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is directed to a solid state binder composition, wherein the binder comprises a component (i) in form of one or more compounds selected from compounds of the formula, and any salts thereof, such as ammonium salts and/oramine salts thereof: (formula I) in which R1 corresponds to H, alkyl, monohydroxyalkyl, dihydroxyalkyl, polyhydroxyalkyl, alkylene, alkoxy, amine; compounds of the formula, and any salts thereof, such as ammonium salts and/oramine salts thereof: (formula II) in which R2 corresponds to H, alkyl, monohydroxyalkyl, dihydroxyalkyl, polyhydroxyalkyl, alkylene, alkoxy, amine; a component (ii) in the form of one or more carbohydrates.