Solid-State Deposition of Magnetizable Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional magnets in electronic devices and accessories are often pre-sized and pre-magnetized, limiting design flexibility and leading to inefficient use of space and material, as well as unwanted gaps and thickness issues due to their fixed shape and size.

Innovation Solution

The integration of magnetizable materials through solid-state deposition techniques, allowing for the formation of custom-shaped magnetic elements within electronic devices and accessories, which can be magnetized post-deposition to achieve desired magnetic properties and reduce material consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If pre-sized and pre-constructed magnets are used, then magnetic function is achieved, but design flexibility is limited and material usage is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidmaterial efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state parameter of magnetic material from pre-formed solid magnets to magnetizable powder or slurry that can be deposited and shaped. This allows the material to conform to any cavity shape while minimizing waste, as the magnetic properties are applied only where needed rather than using excess material in traditional magnet forms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of pre-shaping magnets with molds and machining processes with a deposition-based system where magnetizable material is applied to cavities and then magnetized. This substitution enables complex shapes to be achieved through deposition rather than mechanical fabrication, improving both design flexibility and material efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If pre-shaped magnets are used, then magnetic function is provided, but gaps and thickness issues occur due to fixed shape and size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic functionVSAvoidcustom shape capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by depositing magnetizable material only in the specific cavity regions where magnetic function is required, rather than using uniform pre-shaped magnets. The material is applied locally to match the exact geometry of the cavity, eliminating gaps and achieving precise thickness control in each region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the shape parameter from fixed pre-formed magnets to variable shapes that conform to cavity geometry. By using deposition techniques, the magnetic material can be shaped to exactly match any cavity configuration, eliminating the gaps and thickness variations that occur with standard pre-shaped magnets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional magnets are integrated, then magnetic functionality is achieved, but design and construction are limited by magnet size and structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign optionsVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the magnetic material application process with the device manufacturing process itself. By integrating the deposition and magnetization steps into the assembly line, the magnetic components are created and integrated in one continuous process rather than requiring separate magnet procurement and assembly steps, thereby reducing overall integration complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal deposition and magnetization system that can handle various cavity shapes, sizes, and configurations. This multi-functional approach allows the same equipment and process to produce different magnetic component geometries, expanding design options without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more flexible design options, reduces material usage, eliminates gaps, and allows for customized magnetic properties, enhancing the functionality and aesthetics of electronic devices and accessories.

Implementation Method 1

solid state depositing a magnetizable material on a material-receiving portion of a structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolid state deposition: Deposition (physical)

Implementation Method 2

magnetizing the deposited magnetizable material subsequent to the depositing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetization: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS10861629B1Solid state deposition of magnetizable materials
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 APPLE INC
  • US10861629B1 patent drawing
  • US10861629B1 patent drawing
  • US10861629B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Solid-state deposition of materials and structures formed thereof are described. In particular embodiments, solid-state deposition of materials may be utilized for integrated magnetic assemblies. The integrated magnetic assemblies may include a substrate having a cavity that is physically isolated from an environment external from the substrate and a magnetizable magnetic element formed of particles of magnetizable material. The magnetizable magnetic element may be carried within the cavity such that the magnetizable magnetic element fills the cavity and takes on a size and a shape of the cavity.