Solid-State Memory Retry via Buffer Resubmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In data storage devices, failed write operations to solid-state memory, such as flash devices, often require resubmitting entire user data blocks for reliability, leading to inefficiencies and delays, especially during power loss events where time is critical.

Innovation Solution

A data storage system with buffering capabilities that allows direct resubmission of failed flash blocks from stored buffers, minimizing the need for reprocessing and maintaining the programming pipeline, thus reducing overall programming time and overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If failed programming blocks are resubmitted to solid-state memory, then data reliability is improved, but data pipeline interruption and programming delays occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata reliabilityVSAvoidprogramming delays
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by detecting programming failures early in the process and immediately implementing retry logic with dynamic parameter adjustment. The controller monitors programming operations in real-time and prepares alternative programming parameters before complete failure occurs, allowing for quicker recovery without full pipeline interruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces dynamic adjustment of programming parameters (such as programming voltage, pulse width, or temperature) based on real-time feedback from failed programming attempts. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize retry strategies on-the-fly, reducing the time lost during resubmission while maintaining data reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If entire user data blocks are resubmitted for failed write operations, then data integrity is maintained, but processing efficiency and throughput decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the user data block into smaller units or pages, allowing selective resubmission of only the failed portions rather than the entire data block. This segmentation enables the successful portions to be committed immediately while only the failed segments undergo retry processing, thereby maintaining data integrity for successful writes while improving overall processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and isolates the specific failed programming blocks from the larger data set, allowing them to be processed separately through retry mechanisms while the rest of the data pipeline continues uninterrupted. This extraction approach prevents failure propagation and maintains high throughput for successful operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If programming operations are interrupted for retry, then failed data can be corrected, but power consumption increases during power loss events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata correctionVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by performing only the minimum necessary retry operations to correct failed programming blocks, rather than reprocessing entire data blocks. This approach uses just enough power to achieve correction without excessive energy consumption, which is critical during power loss events where energy resources are limited.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes programming parameters dynamically during retry operations, adjusting voltage levels, pulse durations, or temperature based on the specific failure mode detected. This parameter optimization reduces the energy required for retry operations while maintaining the ability to correct failed data, addressing the power consumption concern during power loss events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8788880B1Efficient retry mechanism for solid-state memory failures
Publication Date: 2014.07.22 WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US8788880B1 patent drawing
  • US8788880B1 patent drawing
  • US8788880B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A data storage subsystem is disclosed that implements a solid-state data buffering scheme. Prior to completion of programming in solid-state storage media, data that is formatted for storage in solid-state media is maintained in one or more buffers. The system is able to retry failed programming operations directly from the buffers, rather than reprocessing the data. The relevant programming pipeline may therefore be preserved by skipping over a failed write operation and reprocessing the data at the end of the current pipeline processing cycle.