Solid State Mineral Wool Binder Using Carbohydrates and Sulfamic Acid

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mineral wool binder technologies face challenges in producing formaldehyde-free, economically viable, and renewable materials with good bonding properties and long-term mechanical properties, while also being environmentally friendly.

Innovation Solution

A solid-state binder composition comprising carbohydrates and sulfamic acid or its derivatives, which does not require aqueous form application, offering excellent bonding properties and reduced reaction loss compared to conventional binders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional dry binders (phenol-formaldehyde resin) are used, then good bonding properties are achieved, but formaldehyde emission occurs and renewable materials are not utilized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformaldehyde emissionVSAvoidbonding properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters of the binder by replacing phenol-formaldehyde resin with a new system comprising carbohydrates (component i) and sulfamic acid or derivatives (component ii), eliminating formaldehyde emission while maintaining bonding effectiveness through the curable reaction between these components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite binder system combining carbohydrates and sulfamic acid derivatives that work synergistically to provide both environmental benefits (no formaldehyde) and technical performance (good bonding), with the carbohydrate providing the base structure and sulfamic acid providing curable crosslinking functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If expensive chemical starting materials are used, then good bonding properties are achieved, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding propertiesVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs inexpensive, readily available starting materials including carbohydrates (such as sugars or starch derivatives) and sulfamic acid or its salts, replacing expensive specialized chemicals while achieving comparable or superior bonding performance through the curable reaction system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The binder system utilizes readily available, low-cost materials that can be easily handled and processed, with the curable reaction occurring in-situ during product manufacturing, eliminating the need for complex preprocessing or specialized handling procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If liquid binder compositions are used, then bonding properties are improved, but the binder must be brought into aqueous form which complicates the process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding propertiesVSAvoidapplication process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state parameter of the binder from liquid/aqueous to solid state, allowing direct application to mineral fibres without requiring dissolution in water or other solvents, simplifying the application process while maintaining effective bonding through the curable reaction of the solid components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the water/solvent component from traditional liquid binder formulations, using only the essential active ingredients (carbohydrate and sulfamic acid derivative) in solid form, which then react together during the curing process to achieve bonding without requiring aqueous preparation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If pre-reaction is performed for binder preparation, then bonding properties are improved, but reaction loss increases and process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding propertiesVSAvoidreaction loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary mixing of the carbohydrate and sulfamic acid derivative components in solid state before application, creating a stable, free-flowing mixture that reacts upon contact with mineral fibres or during curing, avoiding the need for preliminary aqueous reaction steps that cause material loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts what would traditionally be a harmful loss (reaction loss during pre-reaction) into a benefit by designing a system where the reaction occurs in-situ during the intended application process, eliminating wasted material while achieving the necessary bonding through the curable reaction between components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The binder composition provides economically produced, renewable, and environmentally friendly mineral wool products with improved mechanical and fire resistance properties, eliminating the need for pre-reaction and associated losses.

Implementation Method 1

a component (i) in form of one or more carbohydrates; a component (ii) in form of one or more compounds selected from sulfamic acid, derivatives of sulfamic acid or any salt thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical Bonding: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP3341334B1Solid state binder
Publication Date: 2020.06.17 ROCKWOOL INT AS
  • EP3341334B1 patent drawing
  • EP3341334B1 patent drawing
  • EP3341334B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is directed to a solid state binder composition for binding mineral fibers comprising a component (i) in form of one or more carbohydrates; a component (ii) in form of one or more compounds selected from sulfamic acid, derivatives of sulfamic acid or any salt thereof.