Soluble MIP Cross-Linking for High Binding Capacity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for preparing molecular imprinted polymers (MIPs) often result in low reproducibility and compromised binding capacity and specificity, particularly for insoluble MIPs, which are challenging to produce with high yields and desired particle sizes, and lack efficient methods for separating effective binders from non-binders.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the preparation of soluble MIPs followed by affinity purification and subsequent cross-linking to form insoluble MIPs, allowing for the production of particles with high binding capacity and specificity, and enabling the creation of articles with desired shapes and structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional methods are used to prepare insoluble MIPs directly, then binding capacity and specificity can be achieved, but reproducibility is low and production is challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereproducibilityVSAvoidease of production
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the MIP preparation process into two separate stages: first preparing soluble MIPs with controlled molecular weights, then cross-linking them to form insoluble MIPs. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently, improving reproducibility while maintaining ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary preparation of soluble MIPs with desired binding properties before cross-linking. This preliminary action ensures that the MIPs have optimal molecular weights and binding capacities before being converted to insoluble form, thereby improving reproducibility of the final product.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If soluble MIPs are prepared and then cross-linked to form insoluble MIPs, then yield of high-affinity MIPs is enhanced, but additional processing steps are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield of high-affinity MIPsVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent controls the molecular weight of soluble MIPs by adjusting polymerization parameters, then uses cross-linking to transform them into insoluble MIPs. This parameter control approach maximizes the yield of high-affinity MIPs while the systematic process design keeps complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses soluble MIPs as an intermediary form between the polymerization reaction and the final insoluble MIP product. This intermediary state allows for better control over binding properties and facilitates purification before cross-linking, enhancing overall yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If MIPs are produced with consistent binding capacities, then quality is improved, but production cost may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of binding capacityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves consistent binding capacities by precisely controlling polymerization parameters such as monomer-to-template ratio, cross-linker concentration, and reaction conditions. This parameter control ensures uniform MIP properties across batches, and the method itself remains cost-effective compared to alternative purification approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies the downsizing process, enhances the yield of high-affinity MIPs, allows for more cost-effective chromatographic purification, and enables the production of MIPs with consistent binding capacities and specificities, suitable for various applications, including therapeutic uses.

Implementation Method 1

providing soluble or semi-soluble MIPs that bind template agents

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMolecular recognition: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 2

cross-linking the template agent binding soluble MIPs provided in step a so as to obtain insoluble MIPs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCross-linking: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

purification by chromatography using a packed bed with chromatographic matrix material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChromatography: Chromatography

Data Source

PatentEP2819778B1Preparation of molecular imprinted polymers by cross-linking
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 MIPSALUS APS

AI summary

Provided is an improved method for preparation of insoluble molecular imprinted polymers (MIPs), the method comprising : a) providing soluble or semi-soluble MIPs that 1) substantially all bind template agents and 2) have sizes which enable their separation in a chromatographic step utilizing packed bed chromatography, b) cross-linking the template agent binding soluble MIPs provided in step a so as to obtain insoluble template agent binding MIPs, and c) optionally isolating, concentrating or purifying the MIPs obtained by the cross-linking in step b. In an interesting embodiment, step a includes an affinity purification procedure, which ensures that the MIPs provided in step a are indeed all binders of the template.