Solution-centric Security Warning Reporting for Static Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing static analysis tools generate numerous false findings, overwhelming users with non-actionable security warnings, making it difficult to identify and remediate actual vulnerabilities in web and mobile applications.

Innovation Solution

Transitioning the analysis report from a problem space to a solution space by processing code pathway traces to identify optimal fix points, grouping findings based on common and user-accessible nodes, and providing actionable solution groups for each vulnerability type.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If static analysis tools perform comprehensive scanning to identify all potential security vulnerabilities, then the coverage and detection capability are improved, but the number of false findings increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability detection capabilityVSAvoidnumber of findings
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large set of findings into smaller, manageable groups based on commonalities in code pathways, taint sources, sinks, and intermediate operations. This grouping reduces the overwhelming number of individual findings into consolidated security issues that share common root causes or patterns, making them easier to analyze and remediate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple related findings into single consolidated security issues. By combining findings that share common taint sources, sinks, or code pathways, the system reduces redundancy and presents a more manageable set of unique security problems rather than numerous duplicate or overlapping warnings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Loss of information

If static analysis tools report detailed raw findings to ensure completeness, then the information completeness is improved, but the usability and actionability of reports deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidreport usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments detailed raw findings into structured groups with clear identifiers, common characteristics, and consolidated descriptions. Each security issue group maintains essential information about the vulnerability while organizing it in a way that is easier to understand and act upon, balancing completeness with usability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal grouping framework that can handle multiple types of security findings through a common structure. This framework provides a standardized way to present diverse security issues, making the report systematically usable across different vulnerability types while preserving necessary details.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If static analysis tools analyze all code pathways to ensure thoroughness, then the analysis completeness is improved, but the analysis time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis completenessVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary grouping and consolidation of findings before detailed analysis. By organizing code pathways, taint sources, and sinks into groups based on common characteristics in advance, the system reduces the computational complexity of subsequent analysis while maintaining thoroughness through structured organization of all code pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10091232B2Solution-centric reporting of security warnings
Publication Date: 2018.10.02 HCL TECH LTD
  • US10091232B2 patent drawing
  • US10091232B2 patent drawing
  • US10091232B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A new paradigm for security analysis is provided by transitioning code analysis reporting from the problem space (the warnings themselves), to a solution space (potential solutions to the identified problems). Thus, instead of reporting raw findings to the user, the automated system as described here outputs proposed solutions to eliminate the defects identified in the security analysis. A consequence of this approach is that the report generated by the analysis tool is much more consumable, and thus much more actionable. Preferably, the report provides the user with one or more candidate location(s) at which to apply a fix to an identified security problem. These locations preferably are identified by processing overlapping nodes to identify one or more solution groupings that represent an API for a sanitization fix. The report also includes one or more recommendations for the fix, and preferably the report is generated on a per-vulnerability type basis.