Solution-Processible Metal Oxide Hardmasks for High Resolution Lithography

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current photolithography processes face limitations in achieving high resolution and pattern transfer due to the intrinsic chemical and optical properties of organic photoresists, which restrict the etch budget and selectivity, especially at high-aspect ratios, leading to pattern collapse and insufficient etching of substrates.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of a solution-deposited metal oxide hardmask layer formed from polyoxometal clusters and polyatomic inorganic anions, which provides improved etching properties and antireflective properties, allowing for the formation of thin, uniform, and smooth hardmask layers that enhance etch contrast and resolution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If organic photoresist materials are used for pattern transfer, then the lithographic process is simple and cost-effective, but the etch selectivity and resolution are insufficient at high-aspect ratios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetch resolutionVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an inorganic hardmask layer as an intermediary material between the organic photoresist and the substrate. This hardmask layer serves as a mediator that receives the pattern from the photoresist and transfers it to the substrate with enhanced resolution and etch selectivity, solving the limitation of organic photoresists at high-aspect ratios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite structure consisting of organic photoresist combined with inorganic hardmask materials (such as metal oxides or silicon-based materials). This composite approach leverages the advantages of both material types: the ease of patterning of organic photoresist and the superior etch resistance and resolution of inorganic materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If thinner photoresist layers are used to prevent pattern collapse, then the aspect ratio is improved, but the etch budget is insufficient to transfer patterns into functional materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern stabilityVSAvoidetch budget
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the pattern transfer process into multiple stages: first transferring the pattern from photoresist to hardmask, then from hardmask to substrate. This segmentation allows the use of thin photoresist layers for stability while providing sufficient etch budget through the intermediate hardmask layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional organic photoresists are used, then the processing is simple, but the etch selectivity between resist and functional materials is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidetch selectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The inorganic hardmask layer acts as an intermediary that enables differential etching. The etch chemistry is selected to have high selectivity for removing the hardmask while preserving the functional material, achieving etch selectivity that cannot be obtained with organic photoresists alone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameter from organic to inorganic hardmask, which fundamentally alters the etch selectivity characteristics. Inorganic materials provide different chemical reactivity and etch rate profiles, enabling precise control over the etching process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution-processible metal oxide hardmasks enable the formation of high-resolution structures with improved etch selectivity and antireflective properties, reducing pattern collapse and enhancing the ability to pattern substrates with high aspect ratios, while being cost-effective and compatible with high-throughput processing.

Implementation Method 1

heating the hardmask precursor composition after application to the substrate to yield a metal oxide hardmask layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

exposing the layered structure to radiation to form an exposed structure with a latent image

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption (EM radiation): Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS9281207B2Solution processible hardmasks for high resolution lithography
Publication Date: 2016.03.08 INPRIA CORP
  • US9281207B2 patent drawing
  • US9281207B2 patent drawing
  • US9281207B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Solution processible hardmasks are described that can be formed from aqueous precursor solutions comprising polyoxometal clusters and anions, such as polyatomic anions. The solution processible metal oxide layers are generally placed under relatively thin etch resist layers to provide desired etch contrast with underlying substrates and/or antireflective properties. In some embodiments, the metal oxide hardmasks can be used along with an additional hardmask and/or antireflective layers. The metal oxide hardmasks can be etched with wet or dry etching. Desirable processing improvements can be obtained with the solution processible hardmasks.