Solution Recommendation Tool for Network Vulnerability Remediation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vulnerability assessment tools in distributed computing environments identify security risks but lack the ability to provide tailored solutions that consider user-specific constraints such as cost, technical ability, and effectiveness, leaving administrators without actionable recommendations to remediate or mitigate identified vulnerabilities.

Innovation Solution

A solution recommendation tool that receives identified vulnerabilities, determines vulnerability classes, and recommends approaches based on effectiveness, cost, and implementation complexity, prioritizing solutions to ensure they meet user-specific needs, and provides these recommendations to third-party experts for evaluation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If vulnerability assessment tools are used to identify security risks, then security risks can be detected, but the tools lack the ability to provide tailored solutions that meet user-specific constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability detection capabilityVSAvoidsolution customization to user constraints
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the vulnerability management process into distinct modules: vulnerability identification module, constraint analysis module, solution recommendation module, and implementation guidance module. Each module handles specific aspects independently, allowing the system to provide customized solutions by combining different vulnerability data with user-specific constraints such as cost, technical ability, and time resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by incorporating multiple user-specific constraint parameters (cost constraints, technical ability levels, time resources, priority levels) into the vulnerability assessment process. The recommendation engine dynamically adjusts solution recommendations based on these parameter values, transforming a generic vulnerability scanner into an adaptive system that tailors solutions to each user's specific situation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If comprehensive vulnerability assessment is performed, then security risks are identified, but administrators lack actionable recommendations to remediate vulnerabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability identification accuracyVSAvoidactionability of remediation guidance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where vulnerability assessment results are continuously fed into the recommendation engine, which generates actionable remediation suggestions. The system provides feedback to administrators in the form of prioritized solution recommendations with implementation guidance, transforming raw vulnerability data into actionable insights that directly address the identified security risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The recommendation engine acts as an intermediary between vulnerability identification and remediation execution. It processes vulnerability data, combines it with user constraints, and generates intermediate recommendation outputs that bridge the gap between detecting vulnerabilities and implementing fixes, providing administrators with clear, step-by-step guidance on how to remediate each vulnerability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If generic vulnerability solutions are provided, then implementation is simplified, but solutions do not meet user-specific needs such as cost constraints and technical ability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution implementation simplicityVSAvoidalignment with user constraints
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by tailoring solution recommendations to match specific user constraints in different areas. For example, if a user has limited technical ability, the system provides solutions with detailed step-by-step instructions and lower complexity. If cost is a constraint, it recommends free or low-cost remediation options. Each recommendation is locally optimized for the user's specific constraint profile rather than applying a uniform approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The recommendation system is dynamic, automatically adjusting solution recommendations based on real-time input of user constraints. When users input their specific constraints (cost, technical ability, time), the system dynamically re-ranks and re-selects vulnerability solutions to match those constraints, providing adaptable recommendations that change as user needs change, rather than static generic advice.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10546134B2Methods and systems for providing recommendations to address security vulnerabilities in a network of computing systems
Publication Date: 2020.01.28 RAPID7 INC
  • US10546134B2 patent drawing
  • US10546134B2 patent drawing
  • US10546134B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A solution recommendation (SR) tool can receive vulnerabilities identified by a vulnerability scanner and/or penetration testing tool. The SR tool can determine various approaches for remediating or mitigating the identified vulnerabilities, and can prioritize the various approaches based on the efficiency of the various approaches in remediating or mitigating the identified vulnerabilities. The SR tool can recommend one or more of the prioritized approaches based on constraints such as cost, effectiveness, complexity, and the like. Once the one or more of the prioritized approaches are selected, the SR tool can recommend the one or more prioritized approaches to third-party experts for evaluation.