Solvent Reactivity Evaluation via Structural Effect Quantification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack a reliable and accurate way to quantify the structural effects of solvents on reactivity, which affects reaction rates and processes, making it difficult to develop materials with improved performance.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that select N solvents to calculate and evaluate their structural effects using equations involving molar volume, molecular radius, and cumulative probability distributions to determine similarity based on set cut-off values, enabling quantitative measurement and classification of solvent reactivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional methods are used to evaluate solvent reactivity, then the evaluation process is simple, but the measurement precision of structural effects is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precision of structural effectsVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation method
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the qualitative assessment of solvent structural effects into quantitative measurement by introducing specific parameters: molar volume (V), molecular radius (R), and cumulative probability values (ρ). These parameters are calculated using mathematical equations that convert molecular structural data into measurable reactivity indicators, thereby achieving precise quantification of structural effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional empirical and qualitative chemical evaluation methods with a mathematical-statistical system. By using cumulative distribution functions and probability calculations, the invention substitutes conventional chemical intuition-based assessment with objective mathematical modeling, enabling precise measurement of solvent reactivity differences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If no quantitative method is used, then the evaluation process is simple, but the reliability of reactivity evaluation is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of reactivity evaluationVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes a feedback mechanism where the calculated cumulative probability values ρ(Si) and their differences Δdel(Si,Sj) provide quantitative feedback on solvent reactivity. This feedback allows for systematic comparison and validation of reactivity predictions, thereby enhancing the reliability of the evaluation through iterative refinement and objective measurement criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal evaluation system that can assess the reactivity of any solvent by calculating its cumulative probability value ρ(Si) based on fundamental molecular parameters (molar volume, molecular radius). This universal approach eliminates the need for solvent-specific empirical methods, providing consistent and reliable reactivity evaluation across different solvent types through a single standardized framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If qualitative assessment is used, then the method is easy to operate, but the manufacturing precision of reactivity prediction is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of reactivity predictionVSAvoidease of operation of evaluation method
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex problem of solvent reactivity prediction into distinct calculable components: first calculating molar volume (V), then molecular radius (R), followed by cumulative probability value (ρ), and finally reactivity difference (Δdel). This segmentation transforms an intractable qualitative assessment into a series of manageable quantitative calculations, achieving precise reactivity prediction through systematic breakdown of the evaluation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10289807B2Similarity evaluation method for structural effect determining solvent reactivity, and system using same
Publication Date: 2019.05.14 LG CHEM LTD

AI summary

This invention relates to a method of evaluating the similarity of structural effects of solvents determining solvent reactivity and a system using the same, and more particularly to a novel evaluation method that is able to quantitatively measure the structural effect of a solvent having an influence on reactivity upon reaction of the solvent with a predetermined material and to a system using the same.