Somatic Mutation Identification via Barcode Sequencing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current nucleic acid sequencing technologies face challenges in efficiently identifying somatic mutations, particularly in cancerous tumors, due to the high complexity of sample preparation and the need for high-throughput, cost-effective methods that can process large volumes of data quickly to determine biological and diagnostic relevance.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system and method for identifying somatic mutations using nucleic acid sequencing data, which involves obtaining sequence information from tumor and normal tissue samples, applying barcode sequences for multiplex analysis, and employing algorithms to distinguish between somatic variants and sequencing errors by analyzing coverage and error rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If ultra-high throughput nucleic acid sequencing is used to process large numbers of samples in parallel, then productivity increases, but device complexity and difficulty of detecting and measuring increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput of sequencingVSAvoidcomplexity of sample preparation and data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the complex sequencing process into distinct modular components: sample preparation modules, barcode assignment modules, sequencing modules, and data analysis modules. Each module handles a specific aspect of the workflow, allowing parallel processing of multiple samples while maintaining manageable complexity through functional decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses barcode sequences as intermediaries to link biological samples to their corresponding sequencing data. These barcodes act as mediators that enable automated tracking and identification of samples throughout the high-throughput process, reducing the complexity of sample management and data association without limiting throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If computational resources are increased to assemble and analyze large numbers of reads quickly, then productivity improves, but use of energy and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of data analysisVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-processing sequencing reads through adaptive error correction and quality filtering before assembly and analysis. This preprocessing step reduces the computational burden on subsequent analysis stages by eliminating low-quality reads and correcting obvious errors early in the workflow, thereby reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining analysis speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by implementing selective assembly and analysis strategies that focus computational resources on high-priority or high-quality reads. Rather than processing all reads with equal computational intensity, the system applies varying levels of analysis depth based on read quality metrics and biological relevance, optimizing the balance between productivity and energy use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If stringent filtering criteria are applied to distinguish somatic variants from sequencing errors, then measurement precision improves, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of somatic mutation detectionVSAvoidfalse negatives in variant detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through iterative error modeling and quality assessment. The system continuously refines its understanding of sequencing errors by analyzing control samples and known variant databases, then uses this feedback to adjust filtering thresholds dynamically. This allows the system to maintain high precision while minimizing false negatives, as the filtering criteria are optimized based on actual performance data rather than static thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by adjusting filtering stringency based on multiple contextual parameters including read depth, base quality scores, mapping quality, and local sequence context. Rather than using a single fixed threshold, the system dynamically modifies filtering parameters based on the specific characteristics of each variant candidate and its surrounding genomic context, thereby maintaining precision while reducing information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230083827A1Systems and methods for identifying somatic mutations
Publication Date: 2023.03.16 LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORP
  • US20230083827A1 patent drawing
  • US20230083827A1 patent drawing
  • US20230083827A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and method for identifying somatic mutations can receive first and second sequence information, determine if a variant present in the first sequencing information is also present in the second sequence information, and identify variants present in the first sequence information are somatic mutations when the variant is either not present in the second sequence information or the presence of the variant in the second sequence information is likely due to a sequencing error.