Somatic Variant Clonality Estimation From Targeted NGS Panels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional techniques for determining clonal fractions in tumor cells, such as whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS), are time and resource-intensive, while smaller data sets from targeted, panel-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) often fail to provide sufficient information for understanding tumor evolution and informing therapeutic strategies.

Innovation Solution

Methods and systems for determining clonal fractions using targeted, panel-based NGS by selecting a proxy sample tumor fraction based on the highest determined tumor fraction value from somatic alterations, leveraging sequence read data to accurately predict clonality, even when relying on panel-based NGS data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If whole exome sequencing (WES) or whole genome sequencing (WGS) is used to determine clonal fractions, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclonal fraction determination accuracyVSAvoidtime and resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and focuses only on the specific genomic regions relevant to cancer driver events using targeted panel-based NGS, rather than sequencing the entire exome or genome. This extraction approach maintains sufficient measurement precision for clonal fraction determination while dramatically reducing time and resource consumption by limiting sequencing to predetermined gene panels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a simplified, cost-effective computational model that uses basic statistical relationships between variant allele frequencies and tumor fractions, replacing complex, resource-intensive WES/WGS analysis pipelines. This approach provides adequate precision for clinical decision-making at a fraction of the time and computational resource cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Productivity

If targeted, panel-based NGS is used to profile samples, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesequencing throughput and efficiencyVSAvoidsufficient information for tumor evolution understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating sequencing depth and coverage on specific predetermined genomic regions (cancer driver gene panels) rather than distributing resources across the entire genome. This focused approach ensures sufficient measurement precision for detecting and characterizing driver events while maintaining high productivity through targeted enrichment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of genomic coverage from comprehensive (WES/WGS) to targeted (panel-based), and compensates by adjusting the analysis methodology to use statistical models that can accurately infer clonal fractions from the reduced but focused dataset. This parameter change maintains sufficient precision for clinical applications while dramatically improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If conventional analysis techniques are applied to panel-based NGS data, then ease of operation is maintained, but loss of information occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclinical setting applicabilityVSAvoidtumor evolution and resistance mechanism information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-defining panels of cancer driver genes and predetermined genomic regions before sequencing. This allows the use of simplified analysis techniques that focus specifically on these predetermined targets, maintaining ease of operation in clinical settings while preserving critical information about tumor evolution and resistance mechanisms that would be present in comprehensive sequencing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational model that bridges panel-based NGS data and clonal fraction determination. This intermediary analysis layer translates the limited panel data into meaningful biological insights about tumor evolution and resistance, preventing information loss while maintaining the operational simplicity of targeted sequencing in clinical workflows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260011406A1Methods and systems for determining clonality of somatic short variants
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 FOUNDATION MEDICINE INC
  • US20260011406A1 patent drawing
  • US20260011406A1 patent drawing
  • US20260011406A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for determining a clonal fraction are described. The methods may comprise, for example, receiving sequence read data associated with the sample from a subject; determining at least one somatic alteration based on the sequence read data; determining a tumor fraction for each somatic alteration of the at least one somatic alteration based on the sequence read data, such that a plurality of tumor fractions is obtained; determining a sample tumor fraction, the sample tumor fraction corresponding to a highest tumor fraction from the tumor fraction for each somatic alteration of the at least one somatic alterations; and determining a clonal fraction of a somatic alteration of the at least one somatic alteration based on the sample tumor fraction and the corresponding tumor fraction of the somatic alteration.