SON Anomaly Coordination via Range Overlap Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional SON coordination solutions fail to properly coordinate network functions during anomaly instances, leading to unidentified improper or erroneous actions by function instances, and lack the ability to roll back actions caused by anomalies, resulting in potential system performance degradation.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that determine the range of an anomaly attribute, check for overlaps with coordinated function instances, and trigger coordination actions to address conflicts, including creating an anomaly function instance, monitoring resolution messages, and deleting the instance upon successful troubleshooting, with actions such as approving, rejecting, or modifying actions requested by function instances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional SON coordination solutions are used to manage network functions, then automation and self-configuration are improved, but the system fails to identify and coordinate improper actions during anomaly instances, leading to reliability degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of SON functionsVSAvoidsystem reliability during anomalies
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an anomaly coordination function as an intermediary component that mediates between anomaly detection and SON function coordination. This intermediary receives anomaly information, determines affected SON functions, coordinates their actions, and manages rollbacks, thereby maintaining reliability during anomalies while preserving automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where anomaly information is continuously monitored and fed back to the coordination function. The coordination function uses this feedback to identify affected SON functions, adjust their operations, and trigger rollback actions when necessary, ensuring the system responds appropriately to anomaly conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If multiple independent SON function instances operate concurrently to optimize network performance, then productivity and optimization capability are improved, but coordination failures occur during anomalies causing harmful actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization capabilityVSAvoidconflicts between SON functions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The anomaly coordination function serves as a mediator that receives information from multiple SON function instances and anomaly detectors. It coordinates their interactions by identifying which SON functions are affected by anomalies and managing their actions to prevent conflicts and harmful effects during anomaly instances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements preliminary anti-action by proactively identifying SON functions that may be affected by anomalies before they execute harmful actions. The coordination function determines potential conflicts in advance and triggers rollback actions or prevents execution of problematic SON functions, thereby preventing harmful effects rather than merely responding to them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Adaptability or versatility

If SON functions automatically alter configuration parameters to optimize network behavior, then adaptability is improved, but the system lacks ability to roll back actions caused by anomalies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork adaptabilityVSAvoidrollback capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements preliminary action by recording configuration changes and state information before SON functions execute their optimization actions. When anomalies are detected, the coordination function uses these preliminary records to facilitate quick rollback to previous stable states, thereby maintaining ease of repair while preserving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies discarding and recovering by selectively discarding (rolling back) configuration changes made by SON functions when anomalies are detected. The coordination function identifies which changes to discard and recovers previous stable configurations, enabling the network to recover from anomaly-induced errors while maintaining the ability to adapt during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS11102664B2SON coordination under the occurrence of an anomaly
Publication Date: 2021.08.24 NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY
  • US11102664B2 patent drawing
  • US11102664B2 patent drawing
  • US11102664B2 patent drawing

AI summary

It is provided a method, comprising determining a range of an attribute of an anomaly; checking if the range of the attribute of the anomaly overlaps with a range of a related attribute of a coordinated function instance; triggering to execute a coordination action on the coordinated function instance if the range of the attribute of the anomaly overlaps with the range of the related attribute of the coordinated function instance, wherein the related attribute of the coordinated function instance is the same as the attribute of the anomaly, or the related attribute of the coordinated function instance and the attribute of the anomaly correspond to each other.