5G SON Load Balancing Optimization via Distributed and Centralized Segmentation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current self-organizing network (SON) technologies for 5G networks face challenges in efficiently managing load balancing optimization (LBO) and mobility robustness optimization (MRO) across fifth generation (5G) networks, particularly in automating traffic distribution and handover processes without manual intervention, leading to suboptimal performance and user experience.
Innovation Solution
The implementation of distributed and centralized Load Balancing Optimization (LBO) functions within the SON framework, which allows for policy management, performance measurement, and parameter adjustment to optimize traffic distribution and handover processes automatically, enabling efficient resource utilization and quality maintenance.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Extent of automation
If distributed and centralized LBO functions are implemented for automatic traffic distribution, then automation extent is improved, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The LBO function is divided into distributed and centralized components, where distributed LBO operates at individual gNBs for local traffic distribution decisions, while centralized LBO operates at the OAM for global optimization. This segmentation allows automation of traffic distribution while distributing complexity across multiple levels rather than concentrating it at a single point.
Solution Approach 2:
The SON framework acts as an intermediary layer between manual network management and automatic LBO operations. It provides standardized interfaces, policies, and measurement frameworks that enable automation while abstracting the underlying complexity from network operators.
2Ease of operation
If manual intervention is reduced for network optimization, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements feedback mechanisms where performance measurements from LBO operations are collected, analyzed, and used to adjust future LBO decisions. This closed-loop feedback enables automation while maintaining measurement precision through continuous monitoring and evaluation of LBO effectiveness.
Solution Approach 2:
Manual network optimization operations are replaced with automated measurement and analysis systems that objectively quantify network performance. This substitution maintains measurement precision while eliminating the need for manual intervention in optimization decisions.
3Productivity
If load balancing optimization is automated, then productivity is improved, but loss of information about network conditions increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs self-service by automatically collecting, analyzing, and acting on network condition information without external intervention. Distributed LBO functions at gNBs and centralized functions at OAM continuously monitor network loads and automatically adjust traffic distribution, maintaining awareness of network conditions while improving productivity.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary measurements and analysis of network conditions before executing LBO actions. By proactively gathering information about network loads, handover statistics, and traffic patterns in advance, the system maintains comprehensive information awareness while automating subsequent optimization decisions.
Data Source
AI summary
Various embodiments generally may relate to Load Balancing Optimization (LBO) and Mobility Robustness Optimization (MRO). Some embodiments of this disclosure are directed to the following 5G SON solutions: use cases and requirements for the management of distributed LBO and centralized LBO; procedures for the management of distributed LBO and centralized LBO; and management services and information needed to support the management of distributed LBO and centralized LBO.


