SON Verification Function for Conflict Resolution in Self-Organizing Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Self-Organizing Networks (SONs) face challenges in coordinating configuration changes across independent SON functions, leading to potential conflicts and performance degradation due to lack of knowledge about external factors and incomplete conflict detection, resulting in inaccurate verification and potential network instability.

Innovation Solution

A SON Verification Function is introduced to monitor network behavior, verify changes, and coordinate configuration management, performance management, and fault management data to identify and revert undesired changes, ensuring accurate verification and conflict resolution while prioritizing high-priority actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple independent SON functions are implemented to perform configuration changes, then network optimization capabilities are improved, but conflicts between functions occur leading to network instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork optimization capabilitiesVSAvoidnetwork stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A SON verification function is introduced as an intermediary component that coordinates between multiple independent SON functions and the network elements. This verification function monitors configuration changes, detects potential conflicts before they affect the network, and prevents contradictory changes from being applied, thereby maintaining network stability while allowing multiple optimization functions to operate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The verification function performs preliminary checks on configuration changes before they are applied to the network. By verifying the compatibility and correctness of configuration parameters in advance, the system prevents conflicts from occurring, allowing multiple SON functions to safely perform optimizations without compromising network stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If SON functions independently monitor and change network parameters, then optimization speed is improved, but conflict detection accuracy deteriorates due to incomplete information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization speedVSAvoidconflict detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The verification function consolidates information from multiple independent SON functions and network elements into a centralized monitoring point. By merging the data streams and configuration change requests, the verification function achieves complete visibility into network state and potential conflicts, enabling accurate detection that individual functions cannot achieve alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The verification function acts as an intermediary that collects comprehensive information from all SON functions and network elements, then performs centralized conflict detection. This intermediary position provides complete information availability, improving detection accuracy while maintaining the parallel operation and speed of multiple independent optimization functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If pre-action coordination is used to prevent conflicts, then network stability is improved, but verification accuracy deteriorates due to lack of knowledge about external factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork stabilityVSAvoidverification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The verification function implements continuous feedback monitoring of network performance indicators and configuration states. By observing the actual effects of configuration changes on network performance, the verification function can detect whether changes produced desired outcomes or caused unexpected degradation, thereby improving verification accuracy beyond what pre-action coordination alone can achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs both pre-action verification (checking configuration parameters before application) and post-action verification (monitoring network performance after changes). This two-stage approach combines the benefits of preventive coordination with accurate outcome verification, addressing both network stability and verification accuracy requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3138235B1Verification in self-organizing networks
Publication Date: 2020.11.18 NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY
  • EP3138235B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3138235B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP3138235B1 patent drawingFigure 6

AI summary

It is proposed a method of operating a network by a SON Verification Function (20), monitoring of a network behaviour and verifying a change in the network based on the monitored network behaviour. The SON Verification Function performs a post-action verification of CM changes and may request from a SON coordinator to undo CM changes.