Passive Sonar Localization via Acoustic Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current passive sonar systems face challenges in accurately localizing underwater targets in range and depth, especially at longer ranges, due to sound refraction and the complexity of sound propagation paths, which affects the accuracy of existing techniques like narrowband and broadband autocorrelation processing.

Innovation Solution

The method involves receiving passive acoustic signals from an underwater target via multiple propagation paths, correlating the signals to identify correlation features, and using propagation models to select dominant paths and estimate range and depth, with a likelihood factor determining the accuracy of the localization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If narrowband or matched field processing is used to localize in range and depth, then localization accuracy is improved, but a large sonar array is required which is not practical for many applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocalization accuracyVSAvoidsonar array size
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and utilizes only the necessary components for localization by focusing on correlation features from dominant propagation paths rather than requiring a complete large-scale array system. This allows achieving localization functionality with a more compact configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the processing approach from narrowband to broadband correlation processing, and shifts from requiring spatial array configuration to using temporal correlation analysis. This parameter change enables localization without the need for large physical array dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If broadband autocorrelation processing is used to identify time delay between direct and surface-reflected sound paths, then range and depth can be calculated, but performance is greatly degraded at moderate to high sea states due to scattering of surface-reflected sound

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime delay measurement accuracyVSAvoidlocalization reliability in high sea states
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of surface scattering into a beneficial feature by using the scattered energy from multiple paths as additional correlation features. Instead of treating surface scattering as noise to be rejected, the method identifies and utilizes correlation features from dominant paths including scattered components, thereby maintaining reliability in high sea states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic selection of dominant propagation paths based on correlation strength and likelihood factors. The system adapts to changing sea conditions by identifying which paths remain dominant under various sea states, allowing continuous reliable localization despite varying environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If passive sonar systems use beamforming techniques with vertical beam steering to detect and localize submarines, then azimuth localization is achieved, but range and depth localization is not possible because the submarine can be positioned at an essentially infinite number of depths and ranges along the vertical beam steer angle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveazimuth localization accuracyVSAvoidrange and depth information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds temporal dimension to the spatial beamforming approach by incorporating time-delay correlation analysis. While beamforming provides azimuth information through spatial distribution, the correlation processing in the time domain extracts range and depth information, effectively adding temporal dimension to compensate for the loss of range-depth information in pure spatial processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses correlation features as an intermediary between the received passive sound and the final localization result. These correlation features serve as mediators that encode information about propagation paths, time delays, and path characteristics, enabling extraction of range and depth information that would otherwise be lost in conventional beamforming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If sound propagation paths are analyzed to account for refraction effects at longer ranges, then localization accuracy is improved, but the complexity of identifying and processing multiple propagation paths increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocalization accuracy at long rangeVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by focusing computational resources on identifying and processing only the dominant propagation paths rather than attempting to analyze all possible paths. By selecting and processing a subset of the most significant paths (direct, surface-reflected, bottom-reflected), the system achieves long-range localization accuracy without the excessive complexity of complete path analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the accuracy of range and depth localization by accounting for various sound propagation paths and refraction effects, providing a more reliable method for tracking underwater targets even in challenging sea states.

Implementation Method 1

receiving a passive acoustic signal generated by a target. The sound signal travels on at least two propagation paths, i.e., a first propagation path and a second propagation path, to the sonar system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound propagation: Sound

Implementation Method 2

a tendency of the passive sound generated by the enemy submarine to bend (i.e., refract), primarily in a vertical direction, as the sound propagates through the water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound refraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 3

The signal received by a sonar element (i.e., sonar transducer), or a sonar array, is autocorrelated to identify a relative time delay between the passive sound arriving at the sonar element on a direct sound path and the passive sound arriving at the sonar element on a surface-reflected sound path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAutocorrelation:

Data Source

PatentEP2030041B1Methods and systems for passive range and depth localization
Publication Date: 2012.06.06 RAYTHEON CO
  • EP2030041B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2030041B1 patent drawingFigure 2~2A
  • EP2030041B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A to method and system provide a range and depth localization of a passive sound generator, e.g., a submarine target. The method and system use an autocorrelation and/or a cross correlation to arrive at a plurality of range versus depth estimates, which are resolved and evaluated using likelihood factors in order to provide a range and depth localization.