Passive Sonar Data Labeling Using AIS-Based Vessel Sound Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in passive sonar data analysis is the slow, inaccurate, and costly manual annotation of hydrophone recordings for vessel detection, classification, and identification, which is a bottleneck for training data-driven models like deep artificial neural networks, despite the availability of large datasets.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for automatically labeling passive sonar hydrophone data using publicly available vessel positioning data, such as AIS, to estimate sound metrics and apply thresholds for accurate labeling, enabling efficient and automated generation of labeled datasets for machine learning models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual annotation of hydrophone recordings is performed by trained professionals, then labeling accuracy is improved, but productivity is worsened (slow and inefficient)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling accuracyVSAvoidannotation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically generating candidate labels using vessel position data and sound propagation models before human operators review them. This pre-processing step filters and prepares potential vessel detections, reducing the manual workload while maintaining accuracy through operator verification of automated suggestions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If manual annotation by trained professionals is used, then labeling accuracy is improved, but loss of time is worsened (costly and inefficient)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling accuracyVSAvoidannotation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary automated labeling component that generates candidate labels using vessel position data and acoustic propagation models. This intermediary process handles the initial labeling task, allowing human operators to focus on reviewing and verifying results rather than performing manual annotation from scratch, thus reducing total annotation time while preserving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If large amounts of hydrophone recordings are collected, then quantity of training data is improved, but difficulty of detecting and measuring is worsened (harder to label)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining data volumeVSAvoidlabeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the labeling task by automatically processing recordings in batches using vessel position data and sound propagation models. Each recording is divided into time segments where vessel presence is determined based on acoustic metrics, allowing large datasets to be processed systematically rather than as monolithic manual annotation projects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service automated labeling by using publicly available vessel position data (AIS) and acoustic propagation models to generate labels without requiring human operators for each recording. This self-labeling capability allows the system to handle large volumes of data autonomously, reducing the complexity of manual labeling while maintaining data quality through automated consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method provides fast, accurate, and efficient labeling of hydrophone recordings, improving the training of machine learning models for vessel detection, classification, and identification, and enabling larger quantities of high-quality labeled data.

Implementation Method 1

determining, for a particular vessel identification information, an estimated received sound metric for each vessel throughout the detection time-period, based on the timestamped vessel data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound propagation: Sound

Implementation Method 2

The estimated received sound metric may be a signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) signal estimated based on an estimated sound of the respective vessel and estimated noise and/or ambient sound

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio:

Data Source

PatentEP4653916B1Systems and methods for labelling sonar data
Publication Date: 2026.05.20 HELSING GMBH
  • EP4653916B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4653916B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4653916B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6

AI summary

A computer-implemented method is provided of automatically labelling passive sonar hydrophone data for use as a supervised learning dataset, comprising: for a selected passive sonar hydrophone: obtaining actual received sound data throughout a detection time-period, obtaining a hydrophone location, and determining a maximum detection radius around the hydrophone location; retrieving timestamped vessel data associated with vessels within the maximum detection radius during the detection time-period, the timestamped vessel data comprising for each vessel: vessel location information and vessel identification information; determining, for a particular vessel identification information, an estimated received sound metric for each vessel throughout the detection time-period, based on the timestamped vessel data; labelling the actual received sound data, the labels including the particular vessel identification information and being associated with times during the detection time-period where the estimated received sound metric is above a threshold.