Sonar Mount Positioning Mechanism for Hydrographic Survey Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sonar mount systems for hydrographic surveys face challenges in achieving precise and repeatable positioning of the sonar head, particularly in maintaining accurate pitch and yaw adjustments while minimizing drag and inadvertent changes, which affects the accuracy of hydrographic surveys.

Innovation Solution

The enhanced sonar mount system incorporates a precision X-tube indexing mechanism, an extruded aluminum Z-pole foil with segmented design for reduced drag, and a Z-pole mounting assembly with precision yaw angle adjustment, along with an enhanced clamp ring and shear block indexing mechanism for precise cross tube and Z-pole positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a traditional sonar mount system is used, then the system structure is simple, but the positioning precision and repeatability of the sonar head are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sonar mount system is divided into multiple functional modules: a base unit with indexing mechanism, a cross tube assembly with adjustable positioning, a Z-pole assembly with yaw adjustment, and a sonar head assembly. Each module independently contributes to positioning precision while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs adjustable parameters including pitch angle (0-30 degrees via indexing mechanism), yaw angle (via Z-pole assembly adjustment), and reach distance (via cross tube positioning). These parameter changes enable precise positioning while allowing the system to adapt to different survey requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the sonar head positioning mechanism is simplified, then the device complexity is reduced, but the repeatability and accuracy of pitch and yaw adjustments deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverepeatabilityVSAvoidadjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The indexing mechanism pre-establishes discrete pitch angle positions (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 degrees) before the survey begins. The clamp ring with notches and shear block are pre-configured to lock the cross tube at these predetermined angles, ensuring repeatable positioning without requiring complex real-time adjustments during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex continuous mechanical adjustment mechanisms with a discrete indexing system using notches, shear blocks, and clamp rings. This mechanical substitution provides reliable repeatable positioning through positive locking at predetermined positions rather than requiring continuous mechanical control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a conventional Z-pole design is used, then the manufacturing is simpler, but the drag is increased and pitch stability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedragVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The Z-pole assembly incorporates a foil section with specific hydrodynamic properties at the submerged portion, while the above-water portion maintains simple construction. This local differentiation reduces drag in the critical underwater region without significantly complicating the overall manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The Z-pole assembly combines different materials and structural characteristics: a foil section for hydrodynamic efficiency in water, and a solid pole structure for structural integrity above water. This composite approach optimizes performance in different environments while managing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Adaptability or versatility

If the cross tube reach is fixed, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to different survey configurations is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration flexibilityVSAvoidadjustment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cross tube assembly transitions from a fixed reach design to a dynamically adjustable configuration. The clamp ring mechanism allows the cross tube to be positioned at multiple reach distances along the base unit, enabling the system to adapt to different survey configurations such as varying sonar depths and vessel types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10079010B1Compact solar mount
Publication Date: 2018.09.18 BRADLEY REASON
  • US10079010B1 patent drawing
  • US10079010B1 patent drawing
  • US10079010B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A mounting, positioning, and deployment system for the sonar head of a sonar survey system facilitates rapid, accurate, and repeatable alignment of the sonar head in relation to the keel of a marine vessel. Precision and stability are enhanced with refinements to a cross tube positioning apparatus, and further enhanced with an adjustable Z-pole mount and an extruded aluminum Z-pole embodied as, or encased in, a drag-reducing foil.