SONOS Memory Charge Trap Segmentation for Interference Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In non-volatile SONOS memory devices, as cell size decreases, it becomes challenging to prevent charge interference between the source and drain regions due to the shared electric field across the charge trap and tunnel oxide layers, limiting integration density and retention time.

Innovation Solution

A charge trap layer is physically separated using a buffer layer, allowing independent electric fields for the charge trap and tunnel oxide layers, preventing charge movement between the source and drain regions, and enabling reduced cell size without interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If cell size is reduced to increase integration density, then integration density is improved, but charge interference between source and drain regions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration densityVSAvoidcharge interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The charge trap layer is divided into two separate regions by introducing an intermediate layer (such as SiO2 or SiN) between the source and drain sides. This segmentation physically isolates the charges trapped on each side, preventing charge interference while maintaining high integration density through the reduced cell size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediate layer (SiO2 or SiN) is introduced between the source and drain regions of the charge trap layer. This intermediary layer acts as a barrier that prevents charge carriers from moving between source and drain, thereby eliminating charge interference while allowing the cell size to be reduced for higher integration density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If voltage is increased to improve write/erase speed, then operation speed is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewrite/erase speedVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters of the tunnel oxide layer by using a thinner layer (5-10 nm) compared to conventional designs. This parameter change enables efficient charge injection at lower voltages, achieving high write/erase speeds without increasing power consumption, as the thinner oxide allows quantum tunneling to occur more readily at reduced voltage levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Duration of action of moving object

If tunnel oxide thickness is increased to improve charge retention, then retention time is improved, but write/erase voltage requirement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge retention timeVSAvoidwrite/erase voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the tunnel oxide thickness to a specific range (5-10 nm) that balances charge retention and voltage requirements. Additionally, the use of a charge trap layer with specific material composition (SiN or SiO2) and the introduction of an intermediate layer create a structured design that enhances charge retention while maintaining manageable write/erase voltage levels through controlled charge trapping mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This separation enhances charge retention and integration density by preventing charge interference, enabling lower voltage, lower power, and high-speed operation in SONOS memory devices.

Implementation Method 1

the charges stored in the nitride layer 12 are moved toward the semiconductor substrate 10 by means of a Fowler-Nordheim (F—N) tunneling current through the tunnel oxide layer 11

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFowler-Nordheim tunneling:

Implementation Method 2

in SONOS, direct tunneling oxide is formed under the nitride layer. It is therefore possible to implement a memory device having a lower voltage, lower power and high-speed operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDirect tunneling:

Data Source

PatentUS7923335B2Non-volatile memory device and manufacturing method thereof
Publication Date: 2011.04.12 SK HYNIX INC
  • US7923335B2 patent drawing
  • US7923335B2 patent drawing
  • US7923335B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A non-volatile memory device having a Polysilicon Oxide Nitride Oxide Semiconductor (SONOS) structure in which a charge trap layer is separated physically in a horizontal direction, and a method of manufacturing the same. The charge trap layer that traps electric charges toward the source and the drain is physically divided. It can fundamentally prevent the charges at both sides from being moved mutually. It is therefore possible to prevent interference between charges at both sides although the cell size is reduced.