Soot Load Estimation Using Pressure Drop Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pressure drop based methods for estimating soot load in particulate filters lack accuracy over a wide range of operating conditions and filter geometries, failing to account for total pressure drop behavior and non-continuum gas effects, leading to inaccurate regeneration scheduling.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines the total pressure drop and corrected soot layer permeability, using sensors to estimate soot load based on geometric, microstructural properties, flow rate, temperature, and a Stokes-Cunningham correction factor, allowing for timely regeneration when the soot load exceeds a threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional pressure drop based techniques are used to estimate soot load, then the method provides closed loop feedback, but the accuracy in soot load predictability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoot load prediction accuracyVSAvoidpressure drop measurement system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the pressure drop measurement approach by introducing dimensionless parameters (Euler number, Reynolds number) and applying mathematical transformations to the governing equations. This allows the system to maintain closed-loop feedback while significantly improving soot load prediction accuracy across varying operating conditions by making the solution independent of specific flow and temperature conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate computational steps including calculating dimensionless numbers (Euler, Reynolds), determining pressure drop coefficients, and applying mathematical transformations as intermediaries between the raw pressure drop measurement and the final soot load estimation. These intermediaries enable more accurate predictions by accounting for complex flow dynamics without requiring additional physical sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If empirical correlations are used to estimate soot load from differential pressure sensor response, then the approach is simple to implement, but it performs poorly under dynamic conditions and over wide temperature and flow ranges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability over wide temperature and flow rangesVSAvoidsoot load estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the approach from using empirical correlations directly to using dimensionless parameters (Euler number Eu = 2ΔP/ρu² and Reynolds number Re = ρuD/μ) that capture the essential physics across different conditions. By expressing pressure drop in terms of these dimensionless groups and solving the governing equations analytically, the method achieves both broad applicability and high accuracy under dynamic conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces empirical mechanical correlations with an analytical solution based on fundamental fluid mechanics principles. By deriving the soot load from first principles using the Euler and Reynolds numbers, the system achieves universal applicability across different temperatures, flow rates, and filter geometries without relying on condition-specific empirical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If conventional pressure drop approaches are used, then the method is relatively simple, but they do not account for total pressure drop behavior including inlet/outlet losses, channel losses and permeable layer losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal pressure drop accounting accuracyVSAvoidpressure drop analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the total pressure drop into distinct components: inlet/outlet contraction losses, inlet/outlet channel losses, and permeable layer losses. By dividing the pressure drop analysis into these segments and applying appropriate loss coefficients to each, the method accurately accounts for all major pressure drop contributions while maintaining a systematic and manageable analytical framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces pressure drop coefficients (K values) for different loss mechanisms as intermediaries that quantify the contribution of each segment (inlet, outlet, channels, permeable layers) to the total pressure drop. These coefficients serve as mediators that translate geometric and flow parameters into accurate pressure drop predictions for each segment, enabling comprehensive accounting without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If regeneration is performed too frequently, then the filter is protected from over-exposure, but emissions and fuel consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter protection from over-exposureVSAvoidfuel consumption during regeneration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback system that continuously monitors pressure drop and calculates real-time soot load estimates. This feedback enables the control system to determine the optimal regeneration timing based on actual filter conditions, triggering regeneration only when soot load reaches thresholds that balance filter protection with energy efficiency, thereby avoiding both over-regeneration and under-regeneration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic soot load estimation that adapts to changing operating conditions (flow rate, temperature, pressure) in real-time. By continuously updating the soot load calculation based on current operating parameters and historical data, the system dynamically adjusts regeneration timing to optimize the balance between filter protection and energy consumption, rather than using fixed schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

5Loss of energy

If regeneration is performed too infrequently, then fuel consumption is reduced, but the filter may fail due to excessive particulate loading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumption during regenerationVSAvoidfilter durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous feedback mechanism monitors actual soot accumulation and compares it against failure thresholds, enabling the system to schedule regeneration at the precise moment when it becomes necessary for filter protection. This ensures regeneration is performed infrequently enough to minimize energy consumption but frequently enough to prevent filter failure, optimizing the trade-off between these two objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary soot load estimation and trend analysis to predict when regeneration will be needed, allowing proactive scheduling before critical loading occurs. This preliminary action enables optimization of regeneration timing to minimize energy consumption while ensuring filter durability, rather than reacting only after threshold exceedance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a high level of accuracy in estimating soot load across various conditions and filter configurations, enabling optimal regeneration timing and reducing the negative impacts of frequent or infrequent regeneration.

Implementation Method 1

using a differential pressure sensor to measure the pressure change of exhaust gas upstream and downstream from a particulate filter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 2

the porous walls retain a portion of the particulates in the exhaust gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical filtration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 3

the impact of non-continuum gas effects on the pressure drop behavior of the filter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNon-continuum gas effects:

Data Source

PatentUS8161738B2Systems and methods for estimating particulate load in a particulate filter
Publication Date: 2012.04.24 CORNING INC
  • US8161738B2 patent drawing
  • US8161738B2 patent drawing
  • US8161738B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for regenerating a particulate filter may comprise determining a temperature, a flow rate, and a total pressure drop of an exhaust gas flowing through a particulate filter, and determining a corrected soot layer permeability. The method may further comprise calculating an estimated soot load of the particulate filter based on the total pressure drop and the corrected soot layer permeability, and causing regeneration of the particulate filter when the estimated soot load is greater than or equal to a threshold value.