Soot Load Estimation Using Pressure Gradient Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for estimating the soot load in gasoline particulate filters are not precise enough, particularly when using back-pressure measurements, due to unstable driving conditions and interference from nearby pollution control components, which can lead to inaccurate mass estimates and potential filter clogging or fires.

Innovation Solution

A method that estimates the soot load by calculating a pressure gradient using linear regression on pairs of back-pressure measurements and volume flow rate data, with a stability criterion that ensures only reliable data points are used for averaging, thereby providing a robust and accurate estimate of the current soot load.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If back-pressure measurements are used to estimate soot load, then the estimation can be performed continuously during operation, but the measurement precision deteriorates due to unstable driving conditions and interference from pollution control components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous estimation capabilityVSAvoidsoot load estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by continuously monitoring back-pressure measurements and comparing them against reference values or trends to adjust the soot load estimation. The system uses the measured back-pressure signal as feedback to update the estimated soot mass, enabling continuous adaptation to changing operating conditions while maintaining accuracy through iterative refinement of the estimation algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer between the raw back-pressure measurements and the final soot load estimation. This intermediary layer includes signal filtering, noise reduction algorithms, and compensation mechanisms that mediate the relationship between the disturbed measurement signal and the accurate soot load value, effectively isolating the estimation from the harmful effects of unstable driving conditions and component interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple soot load estimates are averaged to improve accuracy, then the measurement precision improves, but the calculation time and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoot load estimation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively averaging only a subset of consecutive load values that meet specific stability criteria, rather than averaging all available measurements. This approach achieves improved precision through selective averaging of reliable data points while avoiding the excessive processing complexity that would result from averaging all measurements indiscriminately, including those taken under unstable operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If pressure differential measurements are taken at the particulate filter terminals, then the measurement accuracy improves, but the measurement becomes unavailable or fluctuates during certain driving conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveback-pressure measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing prediction algorithms that estimate the expected back-pressure values based on historical data and current operating conditions. When actual measurements become unavailable or highly fluctuating during certain driving conditions, the system uses these pre-calculated predictions to maintain continuous and reliable soot load estimation, ensuring measurement availability without sacrificing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method provides a precise and reliable estimate of the soot load, ensuring proper filter functioning and preventing clogging or fires by identifying stable measurement conditions and discarding unreliable data, thus enabling accurate updating of other soot load models and diagnostics.

Implementation Method 1

The filtration principle is identical to that of a particulate filter for diesel engines; that is, filtration is based on the passage of soot through porous channels.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 2

This regeneration process involves burning off the soot. To burn the soot, the engine can switch to a specific combustion mode that raises the exhaust gas temperature to approximately 650°C to burn the soot within the particulate filter, without the use of any combustion aids.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentEP3652421B1Method for estimating a charge of the controlled ignition combustion engine particulate filter
Publication Date: 2021.08.04 PSA AUTOMOBILES SA
  • EP3652421B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3652421B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for estimating a charge of particulate soot in a combustion engine particulate filter, in which method: – a pressure gradient (d Pd V) is estimated by linear regression over a number of pairs of back-pressure measurements across the filter and an estimate of the volumetric flow rate upstream of the filter in the line, – a charge (BF) of particulate soot is estimated from this pressure gradient (d Pd V), – a median over a number of consecutive charge values (BF) is calculated, characterized in that a first stability criterion based on the time taken to calculate the pressure gradient (d Pd V) is considered with, when the time taken to calculate the value of the pressure gradient (d Pd V) is shorter than a calibratable duration threshold, the charge value (BF) estimated from this pressure gradient (d Pd V) is counted in the number of charge values (BF).